[2023] KECPT 450 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 450 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the surcharge order was dated July 4, 2018, and the appellant was required to file an appeal within 30 days, by August 5, 2018. The appellant filed the memorandum of appeal on August 15, 2018, which was outside the statutory period. There was no application for extension of time or leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 450 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mary Mambo; Respondent: Commissioner for Cooperatives Development & Marketing; Interested Party: Wanandege Housing Coop Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Appeal 7 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal Against Surcharge Order
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies Appeals, Surcharge Orders, Limitation Periods, Tribunal Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Cooperative Societies Appeals Surcharge Orders Limitation Periods Tribunal Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Mambo

Appellant

Commissioner for Cooperatives Development & Marketing

Respondent

Wanandege Housing Coop Society Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal Against Surcharge Order

  1. 1 Whether the appeal against the surcharge order was filed within the statutory time limit.
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal filed out of time without leave.
  3. 3 Whether the misquotation of the surcharge order date by the appellant's advocate affects the validity of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the surcharge order was dated July 4, 2018, and the appellant was required to file an appeal within 30 days, by August 5, 2018. The appellant filed the memorandum of appeal on August 15, 2018, which was outside the statutory period. There was no application for extension of time or leave to file the appeal out of time. The Tribunal held that the statutory time limit is mandatory and goes to jurisdiction. The misquotation of the surcharge order date by the appellant's advocate did not alter the fact that the appeal was filed out of time. Consequently, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and the appeal was dismissed with costs to the interested...

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for being filed out of time.
  • Costs awarded to the interested party.