[2025] KEBPRT 263 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the present suit is res judicata because the issues, parties, subject matter, and reliefs sought are identical to those in BPRT Case no E740 of 2021, which was conclusively determined by the Tribunal and affirmed on appeal. The Tenant, whether under the name James Mamboleo or Antony Ogato Mamboleo, was in occupation of the same premises and challenged the same termination notice. The Tribunal held that the Tenant's attempt to relitigate the matter constituted an abuse of process, as all the requirements for res judicata were satisfied: identity of subject matter, parties, title, jurisdiction, and finality of the previous decision. Consequently, the Tribunal...
- Citation
- [2025] KEBPRT 263 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Antony Ogato Mamboleo; Respondent: Paul Mbugua Kang’Ethe
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 4 February 2025
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E129 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (res Judicata)
- Outcome
- Plaint and Notice of Motion dismissed with costs to the Landlord.
- Judges
- A Muma
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Tenancy Termination, Injunctive Relief, Eviction Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antony Ogato Mamboleo
Applicant
Paul Mbugua Kang’Ethe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (res Judicata)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the instant suit is res judicata.
- 2 Whether the Tenant is entitled to the orders sought.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the present suit is res judicata because the issues, parties, subject matter, and reliefs sought are identical to those in BPRT Case no E740 of 2021, which was conclusively determined by the Tribunal and affirmed on appeal. The Tenant, whether under the name James Mamboleo or Antony Ogato Mamboleo, was in occupation of the same premises and challenged the same termination notice. The Tribunal held that the Tenant's attempt to relitigate the matter constituted an abuse of process, as all the requirements for res judicata were satisfied: identity of subject matter, parties, title, jurisdiction, and finality of the previous decision. Consequently, the Tribunal...
Court Disposition
Plaint and Notice of Motion dismissed with costs to the Landlord.
Orders
- The Plaint and Notice of Motion dated 3rd February, 2025 is dismissed.
- Costs to the Landlord assessed at KShs. 20,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment