[2024] KEHC 5042 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence imposed was lawful and in accordance with the mandatory minimum under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. The seriousness of the offence, involving the defilement of a 14-year-old minor under threats and luring, justified the sentence. However, considering the appellant had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 5042 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sabina Ogalo Mandera; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E015 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence partially allowed; appellant released conditionally.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sentencing Principles, Sexual Offences Act, Mitigation, Custodial Sentence, Early Release Conditions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sabina Ogalo Mandera
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for defilement under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act was lawful and appropriate.
- 2 Whether the period spent in custody prior to conviction should affect the sentence.
- 3 Whether the appellant's mitigation and period already served warranted reduction or alteration of the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence imposed was lawful and in accordance with the mandatory minimum under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. The seriousness of the offence, involving the defilement of a 14-year-old minor under threats and luring, justified the sentence. However, considering the appellant had already served nearly ten years of the twenty-year sentence, had shown remorse and evidence of reformation, and the delay in appeal was due to missing court records, the court exercised discretion to order the appellant's release on condition that he does not commit any offence for the next two years. If he breaches this condition, he will serve the remainder of the sentence. The...
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence partially allowed; appellant released conditionally.
Orders
- Unless otherwise lawfully held, the appellant Sabina Ogalo Mandera shall be set at liberty conditional upon him not committing any offence for the next two years.
- Should the appellant breach this condition, he shall, upon arrest, be committed to prison to continue serving the remainder of the ten-year prison term.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
Mandera v Republic (Criminal Appeal E015 of 2020) [2024] KEHC 5042 (KLR) (13 May 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5042 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Appeal E015 of 2020
RE Aburili, J
May 13, 2024
Between
Sabina Ogalo Mandera
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
(An appeal against the conviction and sentence by the Hon. R. M. Nyigei delivered on the 24{{^th}} March 2015 in the Principal Magistrate’s Court in Tamu in Criminal Case No. 19 of 2014)
Judgment
1. On 24th March 2025, the Appellant herein Sabina Ogalo Mandera was convicted of the offence of defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offence Act.
2. He was sentenced to serve twenty (20) years imprisonment as per Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. The minor was aged 14 years old.
3. Aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, he filed this appeal on 1st September 2020.
4. It is not clear from the court record of this very old case, whether he sought and obtained leave for extension of time to appeal as no such order for leave was annexed to the Petition of appeal.
5. The lower court file which is quite old and appearing to have been poorly stored leading to water invasion, was only availed to this court on 14th November 2023 and the appeal was admitted on 1st December 2023.
6. When the appeal came up for directions, the Appellant who appeared in person from Kitale Main Prison and virtually submitted that he did not wish to challenge the conviction. He withdrew his appeal against conviction and urged the court to consider sentence alone.
7. The court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal against conviction.
8. He then submitted in mitigation that he was aged 47 years old. He was held in custody during the hearing of his case, which was a period of 31/2 years. That his wife had left his home and that 3 children were suffering. That he had learnt tailoring in prison. He was a builder, involved in road construction. His youngest child is aged 16 years. That he had reformed and cannot involve himself with children.
9. The prosecution counsel submitted in support of the sentence imposed urging the court to consider the victim’s interest as well.
10. I have considered the appeal against sentence and the submissions in mitigation and opposition to sentence reduction.
11. The victim was a 14 year old class 7 pupil. The Appellant forced the minor to his house saying he wanted to marry her by luring her with tea and threatens to kill her with a knife even when she escaped into the sugarcane plantation wherein he defiled her.
12. The sentence imposed was lawful, a mandatory minimum under Section 8(3) of the Sexual Offence Act.
13. The offence was serious and hence the trial court did not err when it imposed the sentence.
14. However, the convict was arrested on 11th December 2014 and was in custody since then until his trial was concluded on 24th March 2015.
15. It is not true that he was in custody for 31/2 years prior to his conviction. His case was heard expeditiously and determined within 3 months which was a record short period.
16. The appeal has taken long because the trial court record could not be found. He has now been in prison nearly ten years and has a balance of 10 years by which time he will be 57 years.
17. He pleads for leniency saying he has reformed and regrets the offence.
18. In my humble view, the Appellant having served nearly ten (10) years in prison out of the 20 years Mandatory Minimum, he has learnt his lesson and if not, the law that took him to prison still exists.
19. I exercise discretion and order that unless otherwise lawfully held, the Appellant Sabina Ogalo Mandera shall be set at liberty conditional upon him not committing any offence for the next two years and should he breach his condition, he shall, upon arrest, be committed to prison to continue serving the remainder of the ten-year prison term.
20. Signal to issue.
21. I so order.
22. This file to be closed forthwith.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 13th day of May, 2024R.E. ABURILIJUDGEPage 4 of 4