[2024] KECA 1764 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's delay of two months in filing the notice of appeal was not inordinate given the circumstances of confinement and self-representation. The explanation provided by the applicant, namely the late supply of the High Court file, was deemed plausible. The court also noted that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KECA 1764 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sabron Manduka; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E151 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MA Warsame
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Conviction Appeal, Incest Offence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sabron Manduka
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal.
- 2 Whether the delay of two months in filing the application is inordinate.
- 3 Whether the intended appeal raises arguable grounds.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's delay of two months in filing the notice of appeal was not inordinate given the circumstances of confinement and self-representation. The explanation provided by the applicant, namely the late supply of the High Court file, was deemed plausible. The court also noted that the draft memorandum of appeal raised grounds worthy of consideration. Applying the principles from Leo Sila Mutiso v Helen Wangari, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time, finding no prejudice to the respondent and no opposition to the application.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application for extension of time is allowed.
- The Notice of Appeal to be filed within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Manduka v Republic (Criminal Application E151 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1764 (KLR) (4 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KECA 1764 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Criminal Application E151 of 2024
MA Warsame, JA
December 4, 2024
Between
Sabron Manduka
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(An application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, against the judgment of the High Court at Naivasha (Ong’udi, J.) dated 20th June, 2024 in HCCRA No. E020 OF 2022)
Ruling
1. The applicant, was convicted of incest contrary to section 20(1) of the Sexual Offences Act and sentenced to twenty (20) years in Criminal Case No. 14 of 2019 at Naivasha. His appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by the High Court. However, he failed to lodge his notice of appeal within the statutory 14 day period as required by the Rules of this Court. As a result the applicant seeks to file an appeal out of time.
2. The reason for delay, as stated in the applicant’s affidavit is that he was not supplied with the High Court file on time to enable him to lodge his appeal. He avers that his intended appeal has merit and has high chances of success.
3. The respondent through its written submissions contends that it does not oppose the appeal but points out that the delay is inordinate.
4. The matters which should be taken into consideration when the court is called upon to exercise its discretion in instances such as this were stated in the case of Leo Sila Mutiso vs Helen Wangari, (NRB) Civil Application No. 251 of 1997, include:“… first, the length of the delay; secondly, the reason for the delay; thirdly (possibly), the chances of the appeal succeeding if the application is granted; and fourthly, the degree of prejudice to the respondent if the application is granted.”
5. The delay in this case in filing this application is about two months. Given the exigencies of confinement especially where the applicant acts in person in pursuing his appeal. I find that a delay of 2 months is not inordinate and the applicant’s explanation is plausible.
6. I have also perused the Draft Memorandum of Appeal and find that it raises grounds for consideration by the Court.
7. Consequently, the application is allowed with no orders to cost.I direct the Notice of appeal to be filed within 30 days.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024. M. WARSAME………..…………….JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a True copy of the original.SignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR