[2024] KEELRC 728 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had obtained a certificate of costs after taxation of its advocate/client bill of costs, and that the respondents had not challenged the certificate or opposed the application. The court held that under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate of costs is sufficient...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 728 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Manyonge Wanyama & Associates LLP; Respondent: County Secretary, County Government of Kericho; Respondent: Chief Officer Finance, County Government of Kericho; Respondent: County Executive Committee Member for Finance, County Government of Kericho
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment and for Leave to Execute
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs, interest, and costs of the application. Leave to execute granted.
- Judges
- DN Nderitu
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Execution of Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manyonge Wanyama & Associates LLP
Applicant
County Secretary, County Government of Kericho
Respondent
Chief Officer Finance, County Government of Kericho
Respondent
County Executive Committee Member for Finance, County Government of Kericho
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment and for Leave to Execute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of costs issued in favour of the applicant should be adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to execute the judgment against the respondents.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had obtained a certificate of costs after taxation of its advocate/client bill of costs, and that the respondents had not challenged the certificate or opposed the application. The court held that under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate of costs is sufficient basis for entry of judgment and decree in favour of the applicant. The court further held that the applicant was entitled to execute against the respondents for the taxed costs, interest at court rates from the date of taxation, and costs of the application. The absence of opposition or dispute from the respondents reinforced the applicant's entitlement to the orders sought.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs, interest, and costs of the application. Leave to execute granted.
Orders
- The certificate of costs dated 16th March, 2023 for Kshs.1,562,259 is adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
- Judgment is entered against the respondents, jointly and severally, in the sum of Kshs.1,562,259 with interest at court rates from 16th March, 2023 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Manyonge Wanyama & Associates LLP v County Secretary, County Government of Kericho & 2 others (Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 728 (KLR) (3 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 728 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kericho
Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2023
DN Nderitu, J
April 3, 2024
Between
Manyonge Wanyama & Associates LLP
Applicant
and
County Secretary, County Government of Kericho
1st Respondent
Chief Officer Finance, County Government of Kericho
2nd Respondent
County Executive Committee Member for Finance, County Goernment of Kericho
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. In a notice of motion dated 30th October, 2023 (the application) the applicant, a law-firm, is seeking for the following orders –1. That this Honourable Court be pleased to order that the Certificate of Costs dated 16th March, 2023 issued by Hon. Aziza Ajwang to the Applicant as against the Respondents in Kericho Misc. Application No. E018 of 2022: Manyonge Wanyama & Associates LLP versus The County Government of Kericho arising from Kericho ELRC Petition No. 13 of 2017: Richard Kipyegon Kitur versus County Public Service Board, Kericho County and 2 Others for the sum of Kenya Shillings One Million, five Hundred and Sixty-Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Fifty-Nine (Kshs.1,562,259/=) be adopted into judgment and decree of this court.2. That the Applicant be allowed to execute the judgment herein against the Respondents, that is: The County Secretary, County Government of Kericho, The Chief Officer Finance, County Government of Kericho and County Executive Committee Member for Finance, County Government of Kericho.3. That the cost of this Application be provided for.
2. The application is expressed to be brought under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and it is based on the grounds on the face of it.
3. The application is supported with the affidavit of PETER WANYAMA, Advocate, and the managing partner of the applicant, sworn on even date with several annexures thereto.
4. The application follows taxation of advocate/client bill of costs dated 13th October, 2023 wherein the applicant’s costs against the respondents/clients for legal services rendered were taxed at Kshs1,562,259/= on 16th March, 2023 (Aziza Ajwang, DR) and a certificate of costs issued on even date. The certificate of costs is exhibited as an annexure.
5. On 28th November, 2023 when the application came up in court for hearing Miss Kyalo appeared for the applicant and Miss Laboso appeared for the respondents. Amongst other directions issued, it was agreed that the application be canvassed by way of written submissions. The respondents were allocated time to file their responses to the application and for their counsel to file written submissions.
6. However, the respondents did not file a replying affidavit and their counsel did not file written submissions as agreed and directed on 28th November, 2023. Counsel for the applicant filed written submissions on 18th December, 2023.
7. Essentially, therefore, the application is not opposed. The court has gone through the application, the supporting affidavit, and the submissions by counsel for the applicant. The facts as set out by the applicant are not opposed or disputed. The ruling of the taxing master, the certificate of costs, and the certificate for order on costs against the government are all annexed to the application and stand unchallenged. Also annexed to the application is a notice by the applicant dated 19th April, 2023 demanding payment of the taxed costs from the respondents.
8. I have gone through the submissions by counsel for the applicant and the court agrees that in the circumstances judgment be entered against the respondents, jointly and severally, in the sum of Kshs.1,562,259/= with interest thereon at court rates from 16th March, 2023, the date of taxation, till payment in full.
9. The applicant is awarded costs of the application which are hereby granted at Kshs.20,000/=.
10. The applicant is hereby allowed to execute against the respondents for the amounts due and payable in accordance with the law.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED, AND SIGNED AT NAKURU THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024. ....................................DAVID NDERITUJUDGE