[2020] KEELC 3314 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3314 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had a valid and registered lease over the suit property, which was unlawfully surrendered and the land fraudulently subdivided and transferred without proper consent or legal basis. The defendants did not contest the plaintiff's evidence, and the court held that the surrender of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 3314 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mara North Holdings Limited; Defendant: Saruni Kalamet Sengeny; Defendant: ZhongEA Asia Africa Hotels Co Ltd; Defendant: The District Lands Registrar, Narok County
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 118 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted. No award for mesne profits. Costs to the plaintiff.
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Land Transactions, Lease Surrender, Land Subdivision, Land Board Consent, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Land and Property Fraudulent Land Transactions Lease Surrender Land Subdivision Land Board Consent Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mara North Holdings Limited

Plaintiff

Saruni Kalamet Sengeny

Defendant

ZhongEA Asia Africa Hotels Co Ltd

Defendant

The District Lands Registrar, Narok County

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the surrender of lease dated 4th April, 2013 was fraudulent, illegal, and void.
  2. 2 Whether the subdivision and transfer of parcel Cis Mara/Koiyaki/Dagurugurueti/244 was fraudulent, illegal, and void.
  3. 3 Whether the Land Board Consent for transfer to the 2nd defendant was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had a valid and registered lease over the suit property, which was unlawfully surrendered and the land fraudulently subdivided and transferred without proper consent or legal basis. The defendants did not contest the plaintiff's evidence, and the court held that the surrender of lease, subdivision, and transfer were all uncontractual, fraudulent, illegal, and therefore null and void. The Land Board Consent purportedly issued for the transfer to the 2nd defendant was also declared illegal and void. The plaintiff's lease remains valid and in force. The court granted permanent and mandatory injunctions as sought, but declined to award mesne profits due to...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted. No award for mesne profits. Costs to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd defendants from selling, leasing, charging or encumbering parcels Cis-Mara/Koiyaki/Dagurugurueti/3702 and 3703.
  • Declaration that the surrender of lease dated 4th April, 2013 is uncontractual, fraudulent, illegal and void.