[2020] KEELC 87 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 87 (KLR)

The court found that the appeal was filed almost two years after the delivery of the judgment being challenged, well outside the thirty-day period stipulated by Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The appellant did not seek or obtain an extension of time to file the appeal out of time, nor was there any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 87 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Marcell Gakii (Legal administrix of the estate of M’Irianki Murungi); Respondent: Andrew Kaburu M’Rinkuri
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 40 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal struck out with costs to the respondent.
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Record of Appeal Completeness, Extension of Time, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Appeal Out of Time Record of Appeal Completeness Extension of Time Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marcell Gakii (Legal administrix of the estate of M’Irianki Murungi)

Appellant

Andrew Kaburu M’Rinkuri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant sought and obtained extension of time to file the appeal out of time.
  3. 3 Whether the record of appeal was complete and proper for consideration by the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appeal was filed almost two years after the delivery of the judgment being challenged, well outside the thirty-day period stipulated by Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The appellant did not seek or obtain an extension of time to file the appeal out of time, nor was there any explanation or application for such extension on record. Furthermore, the record of appeal was incomplete, as it omitted witness statements and exhibits that formed part of the evidence in the trial court. In light of these procedural defects, the court held that there was no proper appeal before it and struck out the suit with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out for being filed out of time without leave of court.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.