[2008] KEHC 2813 (KLR)
The court held that even if the applicant's advocates were responsible for the delay in filing the appeal, the intended appeal would have failed because the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain disputes between a co-operative society and its members. Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1997,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2813 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Margaret Auma Juma; Respondent: Rongo Dairy Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 24 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Jurisdiction of Courts, Cooperative Societies Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Auma Juma
Applicant
Rongo Dairy Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the ruling dismissing her application for review.
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain disputes between a co-operative society and its members.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that even if the applicant's advocates were responsible for the delay in filing the appeal, the intended appeal would have failed because the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain disputes between a co-operative society and its members. Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1997, expressly ousts the jurisdiction of the High Court and magistrates’ courts in such matters, conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Co-operative Tribunal. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal out of time was dismissed as it lacked merit, and the applicant was ordered to pay costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
OF KISII
Misc Civil Appli 24 of 2008
MARGARET AUMA JUMA …………...................................…………… APPLICANT
VERSUS
RONGO DAIRY FARMERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD…..RESPONDENT
RULING
The applicant filed an application by way of notice of motion brought under the provisions of sections 79 G and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order XL1X rule 5 of Civil Procedure Rules. She sought leave to appeal out of time.
The application was supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant. She deposed that on 23rd May, 2006, she filed a suit against the respondent through the firm of Moriasi – Osoro and company advocates. She was seeking refund of her share contributions held by the respondent.
On 23rd March 2007, the court struck out the entire suit for want of jurisdiction. The court held that such a dispute could only be handled by the Cooperative Tribunal in terms of the provisions of Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1997. The applicant applied for a review of the said ruling and the court delivered a ruling on 11th October 2007 dismissing the application for review. The applicant was dissatisfied with the said ruling and instructed her advocates to file an appeal against the same. She paid them a deposit of Kshs.2000/= on 15th September 2007. However, the said advocates did not file any appeal.
On 17th March 2008, the applicant was served with a bill of costs by the respondent’s advocates. Mr. Sagwe for the applicant submitted that the proposed appeal has high chances of success. He added that the applicant stood to suffer irreparable loss if her application is not granted.
Mr. Odhiambo for the respondent, having taken the court through the events that took place before the subordinate court, submitted that the proposed appeal had no chance of success since it was clear that the court had no jurisdiction to handle the plaintiff’s claim. He referred to the provisions of Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1997.
Mr. Odhiambo added that the applicant had not attached a certificate of delay to her application. He further stated that the provisions of section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act had not been complied with. Section 3Aof the Civil Procedure Act was also not applicable in an application of this nature. Counsel cited the decision of Ringera J, (as he then was), in ADERO AND ANOTHER VS ULINZI SACCO SOCIETY LTD[2002] 1KLR 577. In that case, thesubject matter of the dispute was between a registered Co-operative Society and its members. The court held that it did not have jurisdiction to deal with the matter by dint of the provisions of Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1997.
Under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, this court has power to admit an appeal out of time if an applicant satisfies the court that he has good and sufficient cause for not having filed the appeal in time. Before the court can exercise that discretion in favour of an applicant, the court has to take into consideration the reason given for the delay, the merits of the intended appeal, the prejudice that the parties are likely to suffer if the application is allowed or rejected and any other relevant factor, see MUTISO VS MWANGI Civil appeal No.251 of 1997 at Nairobi.
While the applicant’s previous advocates may be to blame for the delay in filing the appeal, my view is that even if they had filed the same in time it would still have been a non-starter. This is in view of the express provisions of Section 76 aforesaid which ousts the jurisdiction of this court or the magistrates’ courts from handling any dispute between a registered Co-operative Society and its members. Such a dispute should be filed at the Co-operative Tribunalthat is established under the Co-operatives Societies Act, 1997. I therefore agree with Mr. Odhiambo that the application herein has no merits and I dismiss the same with costs.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KISII this 16thday of May,2008.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.
Delivered in the open court in the presence of:
Mr. Sagwe for the applicant
Mr. Oguttu H/B for Mr. Odhiambo for the Respondent.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE