[2020] KEHC 4872 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 4872 (KLR)

The court found that the grant issued to Margaret Kabori M’Ikiugu was not obtained with the consent of all beneficiaries and that the distribution proposed by her did not account for the interests of all wives and children of the deceased. The court questioned the validity of the sale agreements with Agnes Karuti...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 4872 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Margaret Kabori M’Ikiugu; Respondent: Priscilla Kanyamu M’Ikiugu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 32 A of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Protest
Outcome
Partial confirmation of grant with redistribution; purchasers' claims to be litigated separately.
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Distribution of Land, Confirmation of Grant, Revocation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Distribution of Land Confirmation of Grant Revocation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Kabori M’Ikiugu

Applicant

Priscilla Kanyamu M’Ikiugu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Protest

  1. 1 Whether the grant issued to Margaret Kabori M’Ikiugu should be confirmed or revoked.
  2. 2 Whether the distribution of LR Kibirichia/566 and LR Laikipia/Kalalu/1081 was done in accordance with the law and with the consent of all beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether purchasers (Agnes Karuti, Julius Mwiti, John Mugambi) have valid claims to portions of the estate land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grant issued to Margaret Kabori M’Ikiugu was not obtained with the consent of all beneficiaries and that the distribution proposed by her did not account for the interests of all wives and children of the deceased. The court questioned the validity of the sale agreements with Agnes Karuti and Julius Mwiti, noting inconsistencies in the payment records and the lack of testimony from the attesting advocate. The court held that the alleged purchasers' claims should be litigated in the Environment and Land Court, not in the succession proceedings. The estate land LR Kibirichia/566 is to be distributed among the deceased's wives and children equally, with specific...

Court Disposition

Partial confirmation of grant with redistribution; purchasers' claims to be litigated separately.

Orders

  • LR Kibirichia/566 to be distributed as follows: Julius Mwiti – 1.00 acre; the remainder to Priscilla Kanyamu, Marthat Karambu and their children (sons and daughters) to share equally; where any of the sons or daughters are deceased, their surviving children to take their shares.
  • Margaret Kabori M’Ikiugu, Rose Karambu Kaloki M’Ikiugu (deceased), and their children to inherit LR Laikipia/Kalalu/1081 in equal shares.