[2015] KEHC 6881 (KLR)
The court found that the leave to appeal granted by A.G. Munene, Ag. Senior Resident Magistrate, was not proper as it was sought ex parte and well beyond the fourteen-day period prescribed by Order 43 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicants did not seek leave orally at the time of the ruling nor did they...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 6881 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Margaret Kanini; Appellant: Simon Kivuti Kiura; Appellant: Justa Wawira Kiura; Appellant: John Muriithi Kiura; Appellant: Peter Njeru Kiura; Appellant: Irene Muthoni Kiura; Appellant: Ernest Mwangi Njoroge; Respondent: Alice Muthoni Murichi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 17 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Proceedings, Jurisdiction of Magistrate Court, Procedural Timelines
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Kanini
Appellant
Simon Kivuti Kiura
Appellant
Justa Wawira Kiura
Appellant
John Muriithi Kiura
Appellant
Peter Njeru Kiura
Appellant
Irene Muthoni Kiura
Appellant
Ernest Mwangi Njoroge
Appellant
Alice Muthoni Murichi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the leave to appeal granted by A.G. Munene, Ag. Senior Resident Magistrate, was proper and valid under Order 43 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to leave to file the appeal out of time.
- 3 Whether the applicants have shown sufficient cause for stay of proceedings in the lower court pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the leave to appeal granted by A.G. Munene, Ag. Senior Resident Magistrate, was not proper as it was sought ex parte and well beyond the fourteen-day period prescribed by Order 43 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicants did not seek leave orally at the time of the ruling nor did they apply within the statutory period with notice to the other side. The court held that improperly obtained leave cannot form the basis for an application to appeal out of time or for a stay of proceedings. Furthermore, the applicants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or substantial loss that would warrant a stay of proceedings in the lower court. The court emphasized the...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 16th April 2014 and filed on 22nd April 2014 is dismissed with costs.
- The stay orders issued in Kerugoya ELC Civil Appeal No. 717 of 2013 staying the proceedings in Embu Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 242 of 2012 are hereby vacated and that case to proceed to hearing expeditiously.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
48 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
ELC MISC APPLICATION NO. 17 OF 2014
MARGARET KANINI ………………..……………………….. 1ST APPELLANT
SIMON KIVUTI KIURA ……………………………….……..…. 2ND APPELLANT
JUSTA WAWIRA KIURA ………………………………………..3RD APPELLANT
JOHN MURIITHI KIURA …………………………………………4TH APPELLANT
PETER NJERU KIURA ………………………….………………..5TH APPELLANT
IRENE MUTHONI KIURA …………………………………………6TH APPELLANT
ERNEST MWANGI NJOROGE ………………………………….7TH APPELLANT
VERSUS
ALICE MUTHONI MURICHI ……………………………….....……. RESPONDENT
BEING ANAPPEAL FROM THE RULING DELIVERED ON 26TH AUGUST, 2013 BY HON. MRS WACHIRA – C.M AT EMBU CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S COURT CIVIL CASE NO. 242 OF 2012)
RULING
On 31st March 2014, this Court delivered a ruling in KERUGOYA ELC Civil Appeal No. 717 of 2013 dismissing an application by the applicants herein seeking stay of proceedings in Embu Chief Magistrate’s Civil Case No. 242 of 2012 pending an appeal against the ruling of Mrs Wachira Chief Magistrate Embu dated 26th August 2013. In dismissing that application, this Court found that no leave had been sought from the trial magistrate as required under Order 43 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules since the ruling sought to be appealed from arose from a ruling relating to lack of jurisdiction by the trial Court. It would appear that following that ruling, the applicants appeared before A.G Munene acting Senior Resident Magistrate Embu on 4th April 2014 who then proceeded to grant them leave to appeal against the ruling made by Mrs. Wachira Chief Magistrate on 26th August 2013.
Having obtained that leave, the applicants have now moved this Court by a Notice of Motion dated 16th April 2014 and filed herein on 22nd April 2014 seeking the following orders:-
Spent
That the applicants be granted leave to file this appeal out of time
The applicants be granted stay of proceedings in the lower Court pending the hearing and determination of this application
That the applicants be granted stay of proceedings in the lower Court pending the hearing and the determination of the intended appeal
The costs of this application be provided for.
The application is supported by the affidavit of JUSTA WAWIRA KIURA the 3rd defendant/applicant herein.
The application is opposed and grounds of opposition have been filed.
I have considered the submissions by both Mbuthia Kinyanjui advocate for the applicants and Njeru Nyaga advocate for the respondent.
The thrust of the submissions by counsel for the applicant is that a party should not be punished due to the mistake of his advocate. There is a long line of authorities in support of that argument including MURAI VS WAINAINA 1982 K.L.R 38and PHILIP CHEMWENO & ANOTHER VS AUGUSTINE KUBENDE 1982 – 88 KAR 103 among others.
What has agonized this Court is whether infact the order of A. G Munene Ag. Senior Resident Magistrate dated 14th April 2014 granting the applicant leave to appeal against the ruling of Mrs Wachira, Chief Magistrate dated 26th August 2013 was infact proper leave as envisaged under Order 43 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules.That order reads as follows:-
“An application for leave to appeal under Section 75 of the Actshall in the first instance be made to the Court making the orders sought to be appealed from either orally at the time when the order is made, or within fourteen days from the date of such order”– emphasis added.
As no application was made orally before Mrs Wachira, Chief Magistrate on 26th August 2013 when she delivered the ruling subject of the intended appeal, such an application could only thereafter be made within 14 days with notice to the other side. That was not done. Instead, the applicant approached A.G. Munene Ag. Senior Resident Magistrate and obtained ex-parte orders granting leave to the applicants to appeal against the order of Mrs Wachira dated 26th August 2013. That was some eight (8) months later which is well beyond the time prescribed by law. That would be improper. It would mean that a party who required leave to appeal but who did not seek such leave as required in law would simply walk into the Court several months later and on an ex-parte application informs the trial Court:-
“I did not seek leave six months ago to appeal against the Court’s ruling. Give me leave”
I do not think that would be proper. Having not sought and obtained leave from Mrs Wachira, Chief Magistrate on 26th August 2013, the applicant could only obtain leave thereafter with notice to the other side as provided for under the provisions of Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. I therefore find that the leave granted by A.G. Munene Ag. Senior Resident Magistrate on 14th April 2014 was improperly obtained and cannot therefore form the basis of this application to appeal out of time and to stay the proceedings in the lower Court.
Even assuming that there was a proper application before me, the applicants seek to halt the proceedings in the lower Court citing that Court’s want of jurisdiction. Those proceedings are on-going subject to what this Court will rule. No final decrees have been made therein because no judgment has been delivered and therefore it cannot be suggested that if no stay is granted, the applicants will suffer any substantial loss and neither has any sufficient cause been shown to warrant a stay of those proceedings. If anything the stay orders granted in KERUGOYA ELC APPEAL NO. 717 OF 2013 have only succeeded in delaying the determination of Embu Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 242 of 2012. That is not in keeping with the provisions of the Constitution that justice shall not be delayed nor with the overriding objectives of the Civil Procedure Act and Rules that cases be heard expeditiously. Issues of want of jurisdiction could form grounds of appeal if the applicant loses the case in the lower Court. This Court therefore declines to stay the proceedings in the lower Court.
Ultimately therefore, , this Court finds no merit in the application dated 16th April 2014 and filed herein on 22nd April 2014 and dismisses the same with costs. The Court further makes the following orders:-
The stay orders issued in KERUGOYA ELC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 717 OF 2013 staying the proceedings in Embu Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Case No. 242 of 2012 are hereby vacated and that case to proceed to hearing expeditiously
For avoidance of doubt, KERUGOYA ELC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2013 is ordered struck out.
It is so ordered.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
26TH JANUARY, 2015
26/1/2015
Before
Hon. Justice R. Limo
CC – Mbogo
Miss Ooga holding brief for Kinyanjui for Applicant – present
Respondent – absent
COURT: Ruling delivered in the presence of Miss Ooga holding brief for Kinyanjui for the Applicant and in the absence of the Respondent.
R. LIMO
JUDGE
26TH JANUARY, 2015