[2008] KEHC 2550 (KLR)
The court found that the property in question, RUGURU/GACHIKA/503, was acquired during the marriage and constituted matrimonial property. The plaintiff's evidence that she purchased the property and registered it in the defendant's name was uncontroverted. The court held that the property should be subdivided...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2550 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Margaret Ngima Ndaguri; Defendant: Ndaguri Kihagi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 100 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- suit allowed
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Property Subdivision, Ownership Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Ngima Ndaguri
Plaintiff
Ndaguri Kihagi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether property RUGURU/GACHIKA/503 constitutes matrimonial property subject to division upon divorce.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an equal share of the property despite registration in the defendant's name.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the property in question, RUGURU/GACHIKA/503, was acquired during the marriage and constituted matrimonial property. The plaintiff's evidence that she purchased the property and registered it in the defendant's name was uncontroverted. The court held that the property should be subdivided equally between the parties, as the plaintiff's prayer was merited. The absence of a response from the defendant further strengthened the plaintiff's case, and the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought for equal subdivision of the property without requiring production of the original title.
Court Disposition
suit allowed
Orders
- An order is made for the subdivision of LR NO. RUGURU/GACHIKA/503 in equal shares between Margaret Ngima Ndaguri and Ndaguri Kihagi, without necessitating the production of the original title.
- The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
Civil Suit 100 of 2001
MARGARET NGIMA NDAGURI …………...…….. PLAINTIFF
Versus
NDAGURI KIHAGI …………………………….. DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
This suit was initiated by way of originating summons whereby the plaintiff seeks that property No. RUGURU/ GACHIKA/503 be declared to comprise of matrimonial property and having so declared that the court would order a subdivision of the same in equal shares between the plaintiff and the defendant. The defendant although was served with the originating summons did not file a replying affidavit. The matter proceeded by way of formal proof. The plaintiff in her evidence stated that she was married to the defendant. They separated on 8th September 1990. That a decree of divorce was granted. During the subsistence of their marriage the parties acquired property RUGURU/GACHIKA/503. That the acreage of that property is 61/2 acres. The plaintiff stated that she was the one who purchased that property but registered it in the name of the defendant. She said that she registered it in his name because he was her husband. She produced a copy of certificate of search to show the registered owner of the property to be the defendant. She prayed that the court would subdivide that property in equal shares between the two of them. The suit property was occupied by her, her son and his children. The evidence of the plaintiff was uncontroverted. She stated that she purchased the property which she registered in the defendant’s name. She now seeks that the court will order that property to be subdivided in equal shares. I find that that prayer is merited. Accordingly the judgment of this court is as follows:-
1. An order is hereby made for the subdivision of LR NO. RUGURU/GACHIKA/503 in equal shares between MARGARET NGIMA NDAGURI and NDAGURI KIHAGI. Such subdivision should be carried out without necessitating the production of the original title.
2. The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2008
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE