[2015] KEELC 706 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 706 (KLR)

The court found that the Defendant had already served the full 6-month term of civil jail imposed for contempt of court, and had been released. As a result, the application for review or substitution of the committal order was rendered moot, having been overtaken by events. There was no longer any live issue for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 706 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Margaret Rose Wambui; Defendant: Silvester John Njoroge
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 3087 of 1981
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Review of Committal Order
Outcome
application dismissed as overtaken by events
Judges
MM Gitumbi
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Review of Orders, Committal to Civil Jail
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Contempt of Court Review of Orders Committal to Civil Jail

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Rose Wambui

Plaintiff

Silvester John Njoroge

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Review of Committal Order

  1. 1 Whether the court should review its order of 16th May 2014 committing the Defendant to civil jail for contempt of court.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant is entitled to a substitution of the jail sentence with a fine or a reduction of the jail term.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Defendant had already served the full 6-month term of civil jail imposed for contempt of court, and had been released. As a result, the application for review or substitution of the committal order was rendered moot, having been overtaken by events. There was no longer any live issue for the court to determine, and therefore the application was dismissed. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as overtaken by events

Orders

  • The Defendant's application dated 26th June 2014 is dismissed.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.