[2021] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant, as administratrix of the deceased's estate, was entitled to enforce the balance of compensation assessed under the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA) following the deceased's fatal work injury. The Director of Occupational Health and Safety had assessed the compensation at...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Margaret Wanjiru Iraki (suing as the Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Kariuki Mwangi (Deceased)); Respondent: KUDHEIHA Workers Union
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 658 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Work Injury Compensation, Terminal Benefits, Dependants Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Work Injury Compensation Terminal Benefits Dependants Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Wanjiru Iraki (suing as the Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Kariuki Mwangi (Deceased))

Claimant

KUDHEIHA Workers Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment and Labour Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is liable to pay the outstanding balance of terminal benefits to the dependants of the deceased employee.
  2. 2 Whether the compensation assessed under the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA) is enforceable by this court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant, as administratrix of the deceased's estate, was entitled to enforce the balance of compensation assessed under the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA) following the deceased's fatal work injury. The Director of Occupational Health and Safety had assessed the compensation at Ksh.3,456,000, of which Ksh.1,575,000 had been paid by the respondent, leaving a balance of Ksh.1,881,000. The court held that, in the absence of an enforcement mechanism under WIBA, it had jurisdiction to enforce the Director's award. The respondent's mere denials and failure to participate substantively in the proceedings did not displace the claimant's entitlement to the outstanding...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the claimant against the respondent for the sum of Ksh.1,881,000.
  • Each party shall bear own costs.