[2022] KEHC 26971 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 26971 (KLR)

The court found that the Memorandum of Appeal was filed within the statutory thirty-day period as required by Section 79(G) of the Civil Procedure Act. Therefore, the application for enlargement of time and for leave to appeal was unnecessary and superfluous. The appeal was properly on record, and the applicant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 26971 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Maria Angels Meseguer Ferres; Respondent: Eric-Serge Hallard
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Appeal E067 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Family Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Enlargement of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed as superfluous; appeal deemed properly filed and on record.
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Enlargement of Time, School Fees Arrears, Child Maintenance, Appeal Timelines
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Enlargement of Time School Fees Arrears Child Maintenance Appeal Timelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maria Angels Meseguer Ferres

Applicant

Eric-Serge Hallard

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Enlargement of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal against the ruling and order of 2nd July 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the application for enlargement of time to file the appeal is merited given the statutory timelines.
  3. 3 Whether the Memorandum of Appeal was properly filed within the statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Memorandum of Appeal was filed within the statutory thirty-day period as required by Section 79(G) of the Civil Procedure Act. Therefore, the application for enlargement of time and for leave to appeal was unnecessary and superfluous. The appeal was properly on record, and the applicant should be allowed to prosecute it. The respondent would not suffer prejudice by the appeal proceeding, and any challenge to the merits of the appeal should be addressed at the hearing. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs given the family nature of the dispute.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as superfluous; appeal deemed properly filed and on record.

Orders

  • The Memorandum of Appeal dated 30th July 2021 is deemed properly filed and on record.
  • The Memorandum of Appeal to be served upon the respondent, who has 21 days from the date of service to file a reply.