[2022] KEELC 926 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 926 (KLR)

The court held that after the suit was struck out on 24th July 2018, it became functus officio and could not entertain new substantive applications for relief such as eviction, reinstatement, or assessment of damages. The applicants, though holding letters of administration ad litem for the deceased defendant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 926 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Maria Nyongesa Aloka; Defendant: Lazarus Sirengo Mukoyani (deceased); Applicant: Fredrick Wamalwa Sirengo; Applicant: Benjamin Barasa Wafula
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 254 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Outcome
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Functus Officio, Eviction Orders, Administration of Estates, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Functus Officio Eviction Orders Administration of Estates Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maria Nyongesa Aloka

Plaintiff

Lazarus Sirengo Mukoyani (deceased)

Defendant

Fredrick Wamalwa Sirengo

Applicant

Benjamin Barasa Wafula

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant new substantive relief after the suit was struck out and the court became functus officio.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants, as administrators ad litem of the deceased defendant's estate, can seek eviction and other substantive orders in a concluded matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that after the suit was struck out on 24th July 2018, it became functus officio and could not entertain new substantive applications for relief such as eviction, reinstatement, or assessment of damages. The applicants, though holding letters of administration ad litem for the deceased defendant's estate, were not parties to the suit at the time of its conclusion and could not revive or expand the scope of the concluded proceedings. The only matter remaining after the suit was struck out was enforcement of the costs order. As such, the court lacked jurisdiction to grant the orders sought in the Notice of Motion dated 18th October 2021, and the application was therefore...

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 18th October 2021 is struck out.
  • No order on costs.