[2007] KEHC 1959 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1959 (KLR)

The court determined that, in accordance with Practice Direction No. 4 and Legal Notice No 300 of 19th January 2007, leave of the Chief Justice is a prerequisite for the application to proceed. The judge, therefore, declined to make any substantive orders on the application and instead forwarded the file to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 1959 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mariam Abdalla Katoto; Defendant: Chief Lands Registrar; Interested Party: Sheva Hotels Ltd; Interested Party: Samwel Kanogu Ritho
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Children Miscellaneous Application 29 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions
Outcome
Application referred to the Chief Justice for directions; no substantive orders made.
Judges
CA Ombija
Legal Topics
Leave of Court, Practice Directions, Judicial Directions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave of Court Practice Directions Judicial Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mariam Abdalla Katoto

Applicant

Chief Lands Registrar

Defendant

Sheva Hotels Ltd

Interested Party

Samwel Kanogu Ritho

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions

  1. 1 Whether leave of the Chief Justice is required before proceeding with the application.
  2. 2 What directions should be given in light of L.N. No 300 of 19th January 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, in accordance with Practice Direction No. 4 and Legal Notice No 300 of 19th January 2007, leave of the Chief Justice is a prerequisite for the application to proceed. The judge, therefore, declined to make any substantive orders on the application and instead forwarded the file to the Chief Justice for directions. The matter was set to be mentioned before the Chief Justice on a specified date or any other date convenient to the Chief Justice. This approach ensures compliance with procedural requirements and upholds the proper administration of justice.

Court Disposition

Application referred to the Chief Justice for directions; no substantive orders made.

Orders

  • The file is forwarded to the Chief Justice for directions.
  • The matter to be mentioned before the Chief Justice on 30th March or any other date convenient to the Chief Justice.