[2018] KEELC 1672 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1672 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had established her claim to the suit property by providing evidence of purchase, payment, and possession. The defendants did not adduce any evidence to rebut the plaintiff's case, and their pleadings acknowledged the plaintiff's interest in the property. The court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1672 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mariam Mwinyi Kombo; Defendant: Mwanatumu Mwinyi Hamisi; Defendant: Amina Mwinyi Kombo; Defendant: Mwanajuma Mwinyi Mwinyikombo; Defendant: Mwinyikombo Mwinyi Mwinyikombo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 232 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
CK Yano
Legal Topics
Ownership Disputes, Injunctions, Sale of Land, Transfer of Title
Source Language
en
Land and Property Ownership Disputes Injunctions Sale of Land Transfer of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mariam Mwinyi Kombo

Plaintiff

Mwanatumu Mwinyi Hamisi

Defendant

Amina Mwinyi Kombo

Defendant

Mwanajuma Mwinyi Mwinyikombo

Defendant

Mwinyikombo Mwinyi Mwinyikombo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the rightful owner of the portion of PLOT NO. MN.XVII/280/MI and the house thereon.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants should be restrained from selling, disposing or otherwise dealing with the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established her claim to the suit property by providing evidence of purchase, payment, and possession. The defendants did not adduce any evidence to rebut the plaintiff's case, and their pleadings acknowledged the plaintiff's interest in the property. The court held that the plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and credible, entitling her to the reliefs sought, including a declaration of ownership and an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the property.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • A declaration that the portion of PLOT NO. MN.XVII/280/MI and the house thereon belongs to the plaintiff.
  • An injunction restraining the defendants, their servants and/or agents from selling, disposing or in any other manner dealing with the attached goods.