[2016] KEHC 5875 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 5875 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment of the plaint, noting that the application was unopposed and that the amendment was necessary to correct the name of the 2nd defendant to James Muchoka Kathenya. The court found that the amendment was made in good faith, was necessary for the proper...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 5875 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: M'Arichia Mwithiga Kirigia; Defendant: Romano Muthengi Nduyo; Defendant: Kathenya Kanyaka; Defendant: Lands Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Tharaka Nithi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 65 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint
Outcome
Application to amend plaint allowed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Correction of Party Names
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Joinder of Parties Correction of Party Names

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M'Arichia Mwithiga Kirigia

Plaintiff

Romano Muthengi Nduyo

Defendant

Kathenya Kanyaka

Defendant

Lands Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Tharaka Nithi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the plaint to correct the name of the 2nd defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the amendment is necessary for the proper determination of the issues in dispute.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment of the plaint, noting that the application was unopposed and that the amendment was necessary to correct the name of the 2nd defendant to James Muchoka Kathenya. The court found that the amendment was made in good faith, was necessary for the proper adjudication of the dispute, and that no prejudice would be occasioned to the defendants. Accordingly, the application was allowed and costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application to amend plaint allowed.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the plaintiff to amend the plaint to correct the name of the 2nd defendant to James Muchoka Kathenya.
  • Costs of the application shall be in the cause.