[2016] KECA 205 (KLR)

[2016] KECA 205 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the notice and memorandum of appeal, and that the delay was not inordinate. The court also determined that the intended appeal was not frivolous, as evidenced by the draft memorandum of appeal. Furthermore, the court noted that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KECA 205 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Maridadi Flower Limited; Respondent: Henry Isaiah Onjelo
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 43 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file and serve notice and memorandum of appeal out of time.
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Procedural Delay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Extension of Time Appeals Process Procedural Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maridadi Flower Limited

Applicant

Henry Isaiah Onjelo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the notice and memorandum of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal is arguable and not frivolous.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if the extension is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the notice and memorandum of appeal, and that the delay was not inordinate. The court also determined that the intended appeal was not frivolous, as evidenced by the draft memorandum of appeal. Furthermore, the court noted that the respondent would not suffer any prejudice if the extension was granted, since the decretal amount had already been paid. On these grounds, the court exercised its discretion to grant the applicant leave to file and serve the notice and memorandum of appeal out of time, with the condition that the appeal be filed and served within thirty days from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file and serve notice and memorandum of appeal out of time.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file and serve the notice and memorandum of appeal out of time.
  • The appeal shall be filed and served within thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling.