[2025] KEHC 3813 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 3813 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had freely entered into a consent dated 12th March 2025, which resolved the dispute in its entirety. The consent provided for summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff for Kshs. 72,270,000, with clear terms for payment and enforcement in default, including garnishee orders and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 3813 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Marina Homes Limited; Defendant: Lucy Wangui Muturi; Defendant: Chabrin Agencies Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case E001 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Adoption of Consent and Summary Judgment
Outcome
Suit marked as settled by consent; summary judgment entered for plaintiff; enforcement mechanisms in default provided.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Consent Orders, Debt Recovery, Garnishee Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Consent Orders Debt Recovery Garnishee Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marina Homes Limited

Plaintiff

Lucy Wangui Muturi

Defendant

Chabrin Agencies Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Adoption of Consent and Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the consent entered by the parties should be adopted as an order of the court.
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment should be entered in favour of the plaintiff for the claimed sum.
  3. 3 Whether garnishee orders should issue against the defendants' bank accounts in default of payment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had freely entered into a consent dated 12th March 2025, which resolved the dispute in its entirety. The consent provided for summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff for Kshs. 72,270,000, with clear terms for payment and enforcement in default, including garnishee orders and attachment of property. There was no evidence of fraud, collusion, or any other vitiating factor. The court, therefore, adopted the consent as an order of the court, marking the suit as settled in accordance with the agreed terms.

Court Disposition

Suit marked as settled by consent; summary judgment entered for plaintiff; enforcement mechanisms in default provided.

Orders

  • Summary judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff for Kshs. 72,270,000 against the defendants jointly and severally.
  • Defendants to pay the decretal sum to the plaintiff or their advocates on or before 14th March, 2025.