[2024] KEELRC 13204 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 13204 (KLR)

The court declined to grant the application dated 7th February 2024 because the order of mandamus sought had already been issued in the judgment delivered on 6th February 2024. The applicant's repeated request for the same relief was unnecessary and procedurally improper. The proper course for the applicant is to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 13204 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard Kimutai Maritim; Respondent: Governor, County Government of Bomet; Respondent: County Secretary, Bomet County; Respondent: Bomet County Public Service Board; Respondent: Chief Executive Committee Member of Finance Bomet County; Respondent: Chief Officer Finance Bomet County
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E002 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Repeat Application for Mandamus
Outcome
application declined
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Public Service Remuneration, Execution of Judgments
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Judicial Review Mandamus Public Service Remuneration Execution of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Kimutai Maritim

Applicant

Governor, County Government of Bomet

Respondent

County Secretary, Bomet County

Respondent

Bomet County Public Service Board

Respondent

Chief Executive Committee Member of Finance Bomet County

Respondent

Chief Officer Finance Bomet County

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Repeat Application for Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the court can reissue an order of mandamus already granted in a prior judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to further orders where the substantive relief has already been granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant the application dated 7th February 2024 because the order of mandamus sought had already been issued in the judgment delivered on 6th February 2024. The applicant's repeated request for the same relief was unnecessary and procedurally improper. The proper course for the applicant is to execute the existing judgment rather than seek duplicate orders from the court. The court emphasized that it cannot write multiple judgments or rulings reissuing the same orders, and that judicial resources should not be expended on redundant applications.

Court Disposition

application declined

Orders

  • The application dated 7th February 2024 is declined.
  • No order on the costs.