[2013] KEHC 3279 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3279 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiffs had established, through unchallenged documentary evidence, that the late George Bomett was the original allotee of Plot No. 80/Kosprin Shirika Settlement Scheme. The 1st Plaintiff, as administratrix, had obtained Letters of Administration and paid all outstanding charges, vesting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3279 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Martha Bomett; Plaintiff: Benard Kipkoech Bomett; Defendant: Calmax Wanyama Simiyu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 17 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claim succeeded; orders of eviction and permanent injunction granted.
Judges
EO Obaga
Legal Topics
Eviction, Permanent Injunction, Succession Rights, Allocation of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Permanent Injunction Succession Rights Allocation of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martha Bomett

Plaintiff

Benard Kipkoech Bomett

Plaintiff

Calmax Wanyama Simiyu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to an order of eviction against the Defendant from Plot No. 80/Kosprin Shirika Settlement Scheme.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from interfering with the suit property.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiffs have established ownership and exclusive rights over the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiffs had established, through unchallenged documentary evidence, that the late George Bomett was the original allotee of Plot No. 80/Kosprin Shirika Settlement Scheme. The 1st Plaintiff, as administratrix, had obtained Letters of Administration and paid all outstanding charges, vesting the property in her by succession. The Defendant's occupation was unlawful, having been convicted of forcible detainer and failing to vacate despite the conviction. The Plaintiffs proved their case on a balance of probabilities and were entitled to an order of eviction and a permanent injunction as prayed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claim succeeded; orders of eviction and permanent injunction granted.

Orders

  • An order of eviction against the Defendant and/or his servants is issued as prayed for in the Plaint.
  • The Defendant is permanently injuncted from interfering in any way with Plot No. 80/Kosprin Shirika Settlement Scheme.