[2017] KEHC 1292 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 1292 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant's statements were false, defamatory, and published widely, thereby injuring her reputation as a politician, advocate, and public figure. The defendant failed to controvert the plaintiff's evidence or provide...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 1292 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Hon. Martha Karua; Defendant: Hon. Moses Kuria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
20 December 2017
Case Number
Civil Suit 337 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; defendant found liable for defamation.
Legal Topics
Defamation, Libel, Damages Assessment, Reputation Injury
Source Language
english
Tort Law Defamation Libel Damages Assessment Reputation Injury

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hon. Martha Karua

Plaintiff

Hon. Moses Kuria

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's statements constituted defamation against the plaintiff.
  2. 2 If defamation is established, what is the appropriate quantum of damages to award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant's statements were false, defamatory, and published widely, thereby injuring her reputation as a politician, advocate, and public figure. The defendant failed to controvert the plaintiff's evidence or provide justification for his statements. The court held that the statements were motivated by malice, were repeated even after a demand for retraction, and were widely disseminated, aggravating the injury to the plaintiff's reputation. Consequently, the court found the defendant liable for defamation and awarded general, aggravated, and exemplary damages to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; defendant found liable for defamation.

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff for KES 6,500,000 as general, aggravated, and exemplary damages.
  • Interest at court rates from the date of judgment until full payment.