[2015] KEHC 7773 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent and the deceased were not married under any system of law and that the facts did not support a presumption of marriage due to the contested duration of cohabitation and absence of children. Consequently, the applicants, as family members, were entitled to control the burial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 7773 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Martin Luther Ochieng’ Otieno; Plaintiff: Mildred Achieng’ Odhiambo; Defendant: Danston Mutsotso
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 11 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Regarding Burial Permits and Mortuary Fees
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; burial permits to be released to applicants; applicants to conduct burial and settle expenses; respondent may attend burial; reimbursement claims deferred.
- Legal Topics
- Burial Rights, Presumption of Marriage, Succession Disputes, Funeral Expenses
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Luther Ochieng’ Otieno
Plaintiff
Mildred Achieng’ Odhiambo
Plaintiff
Danston Mutsotso
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Regarding Burial Permits and Mortuary Fees
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to the burial permits for the deceaseds Gladys Akoth Otieno and Rosemary Lynn Auma.
- 2 Whether the respondent had a valid marital relationship with the deceaseds to claim burial rights.
- 3 Who should bear the responsibility for mortuary fees and burial expenses.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent and the deceased were not married under any system of law and that the facts did not support a presumption of marriage due to the contested duration of cohabitation and absence of children. Consequently, the applicants, as family members, were entitled to control the burial arrangements and receive the burial permits. The court ordered the respondent to release the burial permits to the applicants, who would be responsible for the burial and related expenses. The respondent was permitted to attend the burial but not to control the process. Any claims for reimbursement or terminal dues would be addressed in a separate forum after the burial.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; burial permits to be released to applicants; applicants to conduct burial and settle expenses; respondent may attend burial; reimbursement claims deferred.
Orders
- The burial of the deceaseds Gladys Akoth Otieno and Rosemary Lynn Auma shall be by the applicants at Alego Siaya County.
- The respondent shall forthwith release the burial permits of the deceaseds to the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
CIVIL SUIT NO 11 OF 2015
MARTIN LUTHER OCHIENG’OTIENO..................1ST PLAINTIFF
MILDRED ACHIENG’ODHIAMBO.........................2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
DANSTON MUTSOTSO............................DEFENDANT
RULING
The Applicants through their advocate filed an application under certificate of urgency dated 12th August, 2015 seeking orders on grounds;
An order was issued by the Court directing the Plaintiff’s inter the remains of Gladys Akoth Otieno.
The Defendant with full knowledge of the existence of the order went ahead to process a burial permit for the interment of Gladys Akoth Otieno.
The Defendant refused to release the original burial permit to the Plaintiffs despite several requests further showing his disobedience to the Court order.
The Plaintiffs cannot proceed with the burial as ordered by the Court without the original burial permit in the Defendant’s possession.
The Defendant will continue disobeying the Court unless this application is certified urgent and heard on a priority basis.
The Applicants through their advocate Mr. Odhiambo informed the Court that following the consent signed by all parties on 31st July, 2015, the Respondent/defendent did not release the Burial Permits for burial of the deceaseds GLADYS AKOTH OTIENO and ROSEMARY LYNN AUMA.
The defendant is alleged to be a stranger to the deceased. They lived together for only one (1) year, 2009 and after that the Respondent went to another wife and came back on learning the deceased died to live in her house
They did not formalize their union in any form of marriage under any legal system. The Applicants sought the burial permits from the Respondent as per the consent of 31st July, 2015. The Applicants sought the Court to order him to pay mortuary fees as he took the deceaseds to Kenyatta University Mortuary without involving the family of the deceaseds.
The Respondent/Defendant responded that he lived with the deceased from 2003 up to the time of her death. They went and swore an affidavit at a lawyer’s office but did not formalize their union under any system of marriage. He did not go to her family at home except he met her brother and sister. They did not have children but he took care of her late daughter Rosemary Lynn Auma. He stated he took the deceaseds to hospital when they were critically ill.
On their death he made a decision to take them to the nearest mortuary. On contacting the relatives instead of assisting; the sister came and collected the deceased’s belongings from the house.
Since they recorded the consent on 31st July, 2015 the family of the deceased isolated him. He has not refused to hand over the burial permits. He produced both permits in Court. He asked the Court to reimburse him for all payments he made towards the deceaseds medical and other expenses.
The Courts finds that the deceased and the Respondent were not married under any system of law. The Court would presume marriage as their union was before the advent of Marriage Act 2014 and the Constitution 2010but in the instant case, there is contest as to whether they actually lived together and for how long? They did not have children and therefore the presumption of marriage will not apply.
In the circumstance the Court makes the following orders;
The burial of the deceaseds GLADYS AKOTH OTIENO and ROSEMARY LYNN AUMA shall be by the Applicants at ALEGO SIAYA COUNTY.
The Respondent shall forthwith release the burial permits of the deceaseds to the Applicants.
The Respondent is at liberty to attend and participate in the burial of the deceaseds in Alego Siaya County.
The Applicants shall settle the mortuary fees and burial expenses as they are solely incharge of all the deceased’s belongings.
The Applicants to be facilitated by Kenyatta University Funeral Home to obtain the bodies of the deceaseds upon payment for burial.
Issues of terminal dues, payments etc shall be dealt with in another forum and/or after the burial/funeral of the deceaseds.
READ AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015
M. MUIGAI
JUDGE
In the presence of
Applicants and Respondents