[2017] KEELC 3140 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3140 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant had subdivided and sold parts of the suit property while the case was pending, exposing the applicants to risk of eviction and potential prejudice. To preserve the subject matter and ensure the effectiveness of the court's eventual decision, it was necessary to grant inhibition...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3140 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Martin Mugambi; Plaintiff: Agnes Mwimbi; Defendant: Njeru Nyaga alias Ndururu Nyaga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 115 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Orders
Outcome
Application for inhibition orders granted; costs in the cause.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Preservation of Suit Property, Pending Suit, Subdivision of Land, Eviction Risk
Source Language
en
Land and Property Inhibition Orders Preservation of Suit Property Pending Suit Subdivision of Land Eviction Risk

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Mugambi

Plaintiff

Agnes Mwimbi

Plaintiff

Njeru Nyaga alias Ndururu Nyaga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Orders

  1. 1 Whether inhibition orders should be issued to preserve the suit property pending hearing and determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the subdivision and sale of the suit property by the defendant during pendency of the suit prejudices the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant had subdivided and sold parts of the suit property while the case was pending, exposing the applicants to risk of eviction and potential prejudice. To preserve the subject matter and ensure the effectiveness of the court's eventual decision, it was necessary to grant inhibition orders restraining any dealings with the suit parcels (KARINGANI/NDAGANI/9554–9565) until the suit is heard and determined. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicants to maintain the status quo and prevent further prejudice.

Court Disposition

Application for inhibition orders granted; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Inhibition orders are issued against land parcels KARINGANI/NDAGANI/9554–9565 until the suit is heard and determined.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.