[2014] KEHC 782 (KLR)
The court found that the alleged distress for rent occurred in Athi River, which falls within the jurisdiction of the Mavoko Magistrate's Court. Both the subject matter and the residence of the respondents are within Athi River, and the monetary value is within the subordinate court's jurisdiction. Although the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 782 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Martin Mukosi Ngaa; Plaintiff: Gladys Muli; Defendant: Kithyo Kata Matemu; Defendant: John M. Mbijiwe; Defendant: Mealine Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 232 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- CM Kariuki
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction, Local Limits, Cause of Action, Monetary Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Mukosi Ngaa
Plaintiff
Gladys Muli
Plaintiff
Kithyo Kata Matemu
Defendant
John M. Mbijiwe
Defendant
Mealine Kenya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be transferred from Machakos Magistrate's Court to Mavoko Magistrate's Court.
- 2 Whether the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of Mavoko Magistrate's Court.
- 3 Whether the Machakos Magistrate's Court has concurrent jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the alleged distress for rent occurred in Athi River, which falls within the jurisdiction of the Mavoko Magistrate's Court. Both the subject matter and the residence of the respondents are within Athi River, and the monetary value is within the subordinate court's jurisdiction. Although the Machakos Magistrate's Court also has jurisdiction, the principle under Section 15(c) of the Civil Procedure Act requires that suits be instituted where the cause of action arises. The court exercised its discretion under Section 18(1)(b) to transfer the suit to the Mavoko Principal Magistrate's Court, as this would be more convenient and appropriate for all parties involved.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Application dated 11.9.2013 is allowed in terms of prayer 1.
- Costs in the suit CC.838/2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MACHAKOS
ELC MISC. NO.232 OF 2013
MARTIN MUKOSI NGAA ........................................ PLAINTIFF
GLADYS MULI ……………………..…..…………… PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
KITHYO KATA MATEMU.............................. 1ST DEFENDANT
JOHN M. MBIJIWE …………..……………… 2ND DEFENDANT
MEALINE KENYA……………………………. 3RD DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
By a Plaint dated 12. 10. 2012 the Applicants were sued in Machakos CMCC.838/2013 on the ground that on 11. 10. 2012 they entered into the Respondents premises in Athi River Township L.R. 33/3220 in pretence of distressing for rent accrued amounting to KShs.2,030,000/- and attached Motor Vehicle KAZ 971 L property of the 2nd Respondent and KBJ 903D property of the 1st Respondent. The Respondents seek the release of the 2 motor vehicles and damages inter alia.
The Applicants who are defendants in the aforesaid suit lodged the instant matter via a notice of motion dated 11. 11. 2013 seeking the said suit Mks.CMCC No.838/2012 to be transferred to Mavoko subordinate court. The Applicants set out their grounds on the affidavit sworn by Tata Matemu Kithyo on 11. 9.2013 and the grounds on the face of the motion.
The Application is anchored on the provisions of Section 14, 15, 18 (1) (b) and 3A of Civil Procedure Act Cap 21. The Respondents have opposed the same via the affidavit of Martin Mukosi Ngaa sworn on 30. 9.2013.
The Applicant’s case is that the subject matter and alleged cause of action arose in Athi River. The Respondents reside in Athi River and the Applicants reside in Nairobi. The local limit of jurisdiction is within the territory of Mavoko Magistrate’s Court. The amount alleged due also is within the monetary jurisdiction of the subordinate court. The Respondents feeble ground of opposition is that the Machakos Magistrate court have also jurisdiction to try the matter and that the Applicants have not demonstrated prejudice they are likely to suffer by matter being tried in Machakos subordinate court.
Section 15 (c) stipulates that every suit shall be instituted in a court within a local limits of whose jurisdiction THE CAUSE OF ACTION WHOLLY OR IN PART ARISES.
In the instant matter, the alleged distress took place in Athi River within Mavoko area where the Magistrate court is located with jurisdiction to try the matter.
The Plaintiff in the suit reside in Athi River and the Defendants reside in Nairobi. It will mitigate express to the parties to proceed with matter in Mavoko Magistrate’s court. The court therefore makes the following orders:
Application dated 11. 9.2013 is allowed in terms of prayer 1.
Costs in the suit CC.838/2012. The file to be transferred to Mavoko Principal Magistrate Court and be mentioned on 16. 1.2015.
Signed and Delivered at Machakos this 19th day of December, 2014.
CHARLES KARIUKI
JUDGE