Kirimi v Republic (Criminal Appeal E007 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 5464 (KLR) (29 April 2026) (Ruling)
Applicant demonstrated exceptional circumstances due to his medical condition requiring specialist care not available in prison; court exercised discretion to grant bail pending appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 5464 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Martin Mwirigi Kirimi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E007 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Right to Liberty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Mwirigi Kirimi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant demonstrated exceptional circumstances due to his medical condition requiring specialist care not available in prison; court exercised discretion to grant bail pending appeal.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Applicant granted cash bail of Ksh.50,000/-
- Applicant to provide one surety of Ksh.50,000/-
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 MARTIN MWIRIGI KIRIMI……...................APPELLANT -VERSUS- REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDE NT RULING 1. This ruling is in respect of an application dated 25th September 2025 filed by Martin Mwirigi Kirimi (Applicant) seeking to be granted bail pending appeal. 2. The Application is brought on grounds reproduced verbatim that:- (a) The Applicant being dissatisfied with the judgement and sentence lodged an appeal HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 1 against the conviction and sentence of the Hon. Joyce Gandani- CM. (b) The Applicant was diagnosed with a medical condition which requires him to have constant and stable medical attention. (c) That the Applicant had instructed the previous advocate to file this application but the same has never been filed. (d) That the Applicant/Appellant had been granted bail/bond terms during the lower court trial and he adhered to the terms without fail. (e) That the Applicant/Appellant is willing to adhere to all the conditions which shall be set by this Honourable Court in regard to the bail bond terms. (f) The Applicant has a medical condition that may jeopardize him if he continues to remain in prison. HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 2 (g) That the Applicant/Appellant’s appeal has high chances of success. (h) That it is in the interest of justice that this application be allowed. (i) That the Respondent shall not suffer any prejudice if the Application is allowed. 3. The Applicant states in his supporting affidavit that he had already filed an appeal against his conviction and sentence and which appeal had high chances of success. That he has been diagnosed with a medical condition which required management by a specialist and that such management was not readily available in prison. 4. Th Applicant stated that he was out on bond during his trial and that he attended his trial faithfully without fail and would equally attend his appeal. HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 3 5. The Applicant attached his medical records including medical report [MM II], X-Rays and scans [MM, 1 III] to support his application. 6. The Application was served upon the Respondent. At the time of hearing of the Application on 19th February, 2026, the Respondent had not filed a response. Prosecution Counsel submitted that the Respondent was not opposed to the Application and only urged the court to grant adequate conditions. 7. The only issue for my determination is whether or not the Applicant should be granted bail pending appeal. 8. The Applicant has come under Article 49(i) (h) of the Constitution and section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC.) Article 49(1) of the Constitution provides:- “49(i) An arrested person has the right - HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 4 (h) to be released on bond or bail, on reasonable conditions, pending a charge or trial, unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.” 9. Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides:- “357. (1) After the entering of an appeal by a person entitled to appeal, the High Court, or the subordinate court which convicted or sentenced that person, may order that he be released on bail with or without sureties, or, if that person is not released on bail, shall at his request order that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against shall be suspended pending the hearing of his appeal: Provided that, where an application for bail is made to the subordinate court and is refused HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 5 by that court, no further application for bail shall lie to the High Court, but a person so refused bail by a subordinate court may appeal against refusal to the High Court and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 352 and 359, the appeal shall not be summarily rejected and shall be heard, in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed, before one judge of the High Court sitting in chambers. (2) If the appeal is ultimately dismissed and the original sentence confirmed, or some other sentence of imprisonment substituted therefore, the time during which the appellant has been released on bail or during which the sentence has been suspended shall be excluded in computing the term of imprisonment to which he is finally sentenced. HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 6 (3)- Analysis and determination 10. The Applicant has already been convicted and therefore lost the presumption of innocence. On appeal, he can only demonstrate exceptional circumstances as to why he should be granted bail pending appeal. In Paul Wainaina Boiyo alias Sheki Nairobi Criminal Case No. 8 of 2024 [2014] eKLR the Court stated:- “An application for bail pending appeal is predicated firstly on the constitutional right to liberty; secondly, on a demonstration of exceptional circumstances and thirdly, it is an exercise of judicial discretion taking into consideration the circumstances of the case…..” HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 7 11. The Applicant’s case is that he was ailing in prison and his heart condition required close management by specialist. I have looked at the medical records annexed to the Application. I am satisfied that the Applicant has demonstrated exceptional circumstances. 12. The power to grant or refuse bail at any stage of proceedings is discretionary. Such discretion, however be exercised judicially taking into consideration the circumstances of each case. 13. In this case I am persuaded to exercise discretion in favour of the Applicant. The Applicant is granted a cash bail of fifty thousand shillings (Ksh.50,000/-.) In addition, he shall provide one surety of a similar amount. The Applicant shall attend court whenever required and shall not impede the hearing of his appeal in any way. HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 8 Orders accordingly. Ruling delivered, dated and signed at Chuka this 29th day of April, 2026. 1. .......................... R. LAGAT-KORIR JUDGE Ruling delivered in the presence of the Applicant, Ms Musyimi for the Applicant and Miss Rukunga for the Respondent; Muriuki (Court Assistant). HCCRA NO. E007 OF 2025 9