[2002] KECA 228 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 228 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time, finding that the circumstances justified allowing the applicant to file the appeal out of time. The memorandum of appeal already filed was deemed to have been filed within the extended period. The decision was guided by the principle that the right...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 228 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Martin Omollo Obonyo; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 4 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Omollo Obonyo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file an appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time, finding that the circumstances justified allowing the applicant to file the appeal out of time. The memorandum of appeal already filed was deemed to have been filed within the extended period. The decision was guided by the principle that the right to appeal should not be unduly hindered where sufficient cause for delay is demonstrated and no prejudice is occasioned to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to file appeal out of time is granted.
  • Memorandum of appeal already filed is deemed to have been filed within time.