[2013] KEHC 4420 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4420 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed amount as per the certificate of costs, as the respondent did not provide any persuasive reason to set aside or vary the taxed bill. The respondent's argument that a deposit had been paid did not affect the enforceability of the final taxed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4420 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Martin Tindi & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Oska Odhiambo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 111 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Bill of Costs
Outcome
judgment entered for applicant
Legal Topics
Advocate Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocate Remuneration Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Tindi & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Oska Odhiambo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed amount in the advocate/client bill of costs.
  2. 2 Whether payment of a deposit by the respondent affects liability for the final taxed costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed amount as per the certificate of costs, as the respondent did not provide any persuasive reason to set aside or vary the taxed bill. The respondent's argument that a deposit had been paid did not affect the enforceability of the final taxed costs, as payment of a deposit does not discharge the obligation to pay the full amount unless it covers the entire sum. The court therefore entered judgment in favour of the applicant for the full taxed amount and made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

judgment entered for applicant

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant in the sum of Kshs. 113,947.50.
  • No order as to costs.