[2021] KEELC 3952 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3952 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated merit in the application, as the 1st defendant had failed to comply with previous orders regarding the deposit and accounting of rental income from the suit property. The inability to trace the former advocate and the lack of opposition from the current advocate on...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3952 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Awino Kweyu; Respondent: Lawrence Mmata Chore; Respondent: Melisa Muhonja Mmata
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 4 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Preservation and Accounting of Rental Income
Outcome
Application allowed; preservation and accounting orders granted.
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Account of Rental Income, Preservation of Property, Advocate Client Accounts
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Account of Rental Income Preservation of Property Advocate Client Accounts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Awino Kweyu

Applicant

Lawrence Mmata Chore

Respondent

Melisa Muhonja Mmata

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Preservation and Accounting of Rental Income

  1. 1 Whether the 1st defendant should be compelled to deposit all rental income from the suit property into court pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st defendant should provide a full and accurate account of all rental income received from the suit property since the previous court order.
  3. 3 Whether the sum of Ksh. 2,500,000 previously deposited with the former advocate should be surrendered to the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated merit in the application, as the 1st defendant had failed to comply with previous orders regarding the deposit and accounting of rental income from the suit property. The inability to trace the former advocate and the lack of opposition from the current advocate on record further supported the need for the court to intervene to preserve the subject matter of the dispute. The court exercised its inherent powers under the Civil Procedure Act and relevant rules to order the 1st defendant to deposit all rental income into court, provide a full account of all rental income received since the prior order, and to ensure that the funds...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; preservation and accounting orders granted.

Orders

  • The 1st defendant is ordered to deposit all monthly rental income from land parcel Butsotso/Shikoti/17938 into the court's account pending determination of the suit or further orders.
  • The 1st defendant is ordered to produce and serve a full and accurate account of all rental income received from the suit property since 4th July, 2019 for certification by the court.