[2019] KEELC 1419 (KLR)
The court determined that the core issue was whether the applicant was served with the notice of taxation and the bill of costs before the taxing master proceeded with taxation. The court found that the application was not a reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order and that the matter of service...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 1419 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mary Cherono Chebabun; Defendant: Wilson Rono; Defendant: Joseph Rono
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 93 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Directions on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Participate in Assessment of Costs
- Outcome
- Application referred to Deputy Registrar for hearing and determination.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Ex Parte Orders, Right to Be Heard, Jurisdiction of Deputy Registrar
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Cherono Chebabun
Plaintiff
Wilson Rono
Defendant
Joseph Rono
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Directions on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Participate in Assessment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was properly served with notice of taxation and bill of costs before taxation was conducted.
- 2 Whether the application to set aside the ruling on taxation should be heard by the judge or the Deputy Registrar.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to participate in the assessment of costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the core issue was whether the applicant was served with the notice of taxation and the bill of costs before the taxing master proceeded with taxation. The court found that the application was not a reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order and that the matter of service and participation in taxation is one that should be determined by the Deputy Registrar who conducted the taxation, or the Deputy Registrar for the time being if the original officer is unavailable. The judge therefore directed that the application be placed before the Deputy Registrar for hearing and final determination, declining to rule on the merits at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application referred to Deputy Registrar for hearing and determination.
Orders
- The application dated 3/7/2019 shall be placed before the Deputy Registrar for hearing and final determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT KITALE
LAND CASE NO. 93 OF 2013
MARY CHERONO CHEBABUN.......PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
WILSON RONO.......................1ST DEFENDANT
JOSEPH RONO......................2ND DEFENDANT
DIRECTIONS
1. The application dated 3/7/2019 which was filed in court on the same date has been brought by the plaintiff seeking the following orders:-
1. …spent
2. That this court be allowed to set aside its ruling arising out of the respondent’s taxation dated 7/2/2019 and hence allow the applicant to oppose the same.
3. That the court be pleased to allow the applicant herein to take part in the assessment of costs arising thereto.
4. Costs of this application be borne by the respondent.
2. The applicant has brought the application under Order 22 Rule 7, Order 21 Rules 7, 8 and 9 and Order 51 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, Section 3A and 63(e)of theCivil Procedure Act.
3. The grounds upon which the application is made are that the respondent’s certificate of cost was taxed ex-parte at Kshs.92,775/= and the respondent did not at all bother to serve the applicant’s advocate to take part in the taxation; that the matter is now scheduled for Notice to Show Cause on 4/7/2019; that the applicant is desirous of taking part in the taxation process and should thus be accorded an opportunity to do so and that in the circumstances, it is only fair and just that the principals of natural justice are promoted to the extent that this application is allowed as prayed.
4. The application is supported by an affidavit of the defendant dated 3/7/2019 which lays emphasis on the above grounds.
5. The defendants filed grounds of opposition dated 15/7/2019 and citing the following grounds:
1. The plaintiff’s application is incompetent, misconceived and defective for failing to comply with the mandatory provisions of the law.
2. The application violates the provisions of Order 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order of the Advocates Act Chapter 16 Laws of Kenya.
3. The application in incompetent, untenable, bad in law and an abuse of the court process filed without any regard to the Advocates Act.
4. This court has no jurisdiction to grant and/or entertain the prayers sought.
5. The application is a nonstarter and an abuse of the due process of the law therefore should be struck out with costs.
6. I find that the application dated 3/7/2019 revolves around the issue of taxation and whether or not the applicant was served with the notice of taxation and the bill of costs before the taxing master taxed the bill. It is not a Reference as provided for by Rule 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order made under the Advocates Act Chapter 16 of the Laws of Kenya. I find that this is a matter ought to be determined by the Deputy Registrar who conducted the taxation and in the event that she is no longer attached to this station the Deputy Registrar for the time being in-charge. The application dated 3/7/2019 shall therefore be placed before the Deputy Registrar for hearing and final determination.
Dated, signedanddeliveredatKitale on this30thday ofSeptember, 2019.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
30/9/2019
Coram:
Before: Hon. Mwangi Njoroge, Judge
Court Assistant - Picoty
Mr. Bororio for Defendants/Respondents
Mr. Kisembe for Simiyu for Applicant
COURT
Directions issued in open court.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
30/9/2019