[2006] KEHC 1171 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's defence was reasonable and corroborated by her co-accused, who admitted sole ownership of the narcotic drugs. The trial magistrate failed to properly consider this defence and the cogent explanation provided by the appellant. In light of the co-accused's earlier release on appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1171 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mary Kerubo Onkaga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 141 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Legal Topics
- Narcotic Drug Trafficking, Criminal Appeals, Evidence Evaluation, Sentencing, Acquittal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Kerubo Onkaga
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of the appellant was based on uncorroborated evidence.
- 2 Whether the trial court failed to consider the appellant's defence and mitigation.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's defence was reasonable and corroborated by her co-accused, who admitted sole ownership of the narcotic drugs. The trial magistrate failed to properly consider this defence and the cogent explanation provided by the appellant. In light of the co-accused's earlier release on appeal and the lack of direct evidence linking the appellant to the drugs, the conviction was unsafe. The court therefore allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and ordered the appellant's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The appeal on conviction is allowed.
- The conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 141 of 2004
(From original conviction and sentence of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Narok in Criminal Case NO.769 OF 2003 – S.M. Githinji – [S.R.M.]
MARY KERUBO ONKAGA………………........................……………..…..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………………………......................……………..……...RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT
Mary Kerubo Onkaga was charged with the offence of trafficking in narcotic drugs contrary to section 4(a) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances Control Act (Act. No. 4 of 1994).
The particulars of the offence were that, on the 31st day of October, 2003 at about 3. 30 p.m. along Narok Mai Mahiu road at Ntulele in Narok District of the Rift Valley Province were trafficking in a narcotic drug namely cannabis sativa (bhang) to wit 18 kilogrammes in a matatu registration number KAP 205X Toyota Shark valued at Kshs.36,000/= in contravention of the said Act. The appellant pleaded not guilty and after a full trial, she was convicted and sentenced to serve 5 years imprisonment and in addition to pay a fine of Kshs.30,000/= or an additional 2 years imprisonment.
The appellant was aggrieved with the above conviction and sentence and she appealed.
In the petition of appeal the appellant has challenged the judgement of the trial court which was based on uncorroborated evidence.
The defence offered by the appellant which was duly corroborated by the appellant’s co-accused was disregarded by the court. The appropriateness of the sentence passed against the appellant was also challenged, so was failure by the trial court to consider the appellant’s compelling mitigation.
The appellant’s co-accused in the lower court one Moreen moraa Mogere pleaded guilty to the charge, was convicted on her own plea of guilty and sentenced to a similar term of 5 years imprisonment and a fine of Kshs.30,000/=.
The said co-accused appealed against the sentence in Criminal appeal No. 503 of 2003 and her sentence was commuted to the period served on 1st February, 2006.
In view of the judgement of this court in Criminal appeal No. 503 of 2003 regarding the co-accused, it is appropriate that the appellant in this appeal who was charged with Moreen Moraa Mogere should similarly be set at liberty by the sentence being commuted to the period already served.
Since the appellant has also challenged the conviction, it is important that the evidence by the prosecution’s case as well as the defence be subjected to this court’s evaluation.
The prosecution’s evidence was that the appellant, who was in the company of a co-accused were arrested on 31st October, 2003 from a Public Transport Vehicle registration No. KAP 205X Toyota matatu while transporting cannabis sativa in two bags which weighed 18 kilogrammes.
The appellant’s co-accused Moreen Moraa Mogere pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and to pay a fine of Kshs.30,000/=. The appellant was put on her defence and she denied that she had anything to do with the consignment of bhang. She explained in her defence that she was invited by the co-accused to accompany her and travel from Kisii to Nairobi, so that she could get for her employment as a maid. They travelled together and Moreen paid for the fare.
The appellant also called Moreen as a defence witness and Moreen confirmed in her evidence that the bags containing the consignment of drugs belonged to her and the appellant was merely travelling with her. We are satisfied that the appellant offered a reasonable defence and a cogent explanation of how she was travelling in the company of Moreen who owned up as the owner of the drugs. Had the trial magistrate considered the appellants defence, the appellant ought to have been acquitted.
Accordingly we hereby allow the appeal on conviction and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant.
The appellant is hereby set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
It is so ordered.
Judgement read and signed at Nakuru this 20th day of July, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE
L. KIMARU
JUDGE