[1997] KECA 145 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 145 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondent failed to serve the Notice of Appeal upon the applicants within the seven-day period prescribed by rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules. This failure was admitted by the respondent's counsel. The rule is mandatory, and non-compliance is fatal to the Notice of Appeal. Consequently,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 145 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Kirigo Kamundi; Applicant: Dickson Mukunyi Kamundi; Applicant: Gordon Nderitu Kamundi; Applicant: James Peter Ngunjiru Kamundi; Respondent: Esther Wangui Kamundi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 158 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Notice of Appeal struck out. Costs awarded to applicants.
Judges
Office of the Registrar Tribunals, GS Pall
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Appeals, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Process Appeals Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Kirigo Kamundi

Applicant

Dickson Mukunyi Kamundi

Applicant

Gordon Nderitu Kamundi

Applicant

James Peter Ngunjiru Kamundi

Applicant

Esther Wangui Kamundi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Appeal was served upon the applicants within the prescribed seven days as required by rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether failure to serve the Notice of Appeal within the prescribed period warrants striking out the Notice of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondent failed to serve the Notice of Appeal upon the applicants within the seven-day period prescribed by rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules. This failure was admitted by the respondent's counsel. The rule is mandatory, and non-compliance is fatal to the Notice of Appeal. Consequently, the Court allowed the application and struck out the Notice of Appeal lodged by the respondent, awarding costs to the applicants.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Notice of Appeal struck out. Costs awarded to applicants.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal lodged on 29th July, 1996 by the respondent is struck out.
  • The costs of this application are awarded to the applicants.