[2016] KEELC 51 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 51 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the suit land until 4th July 2012, when the defendant fraudulently transferred the land to himself using a succession cause, despite the plaintiff being alive. The defendant then subdivided the land into four parcels and registered them in his name....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 51 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mary Muthoni Gichira (suing through her daughter and next friend Naomi Ann Wambui Gichira); Defendant: Samuel Muriuki Gichira
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 63 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
BN Olao
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Transfer of Land, Succession and Estate Administration, Registration of Title, Mental Capacity, Rectification of Register
Source Language
en
Land and Property Fraudulent Transfer of Land Succession and Estate Administration Registration of Title Mental Capacity Rectification of Register

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Muthoni Gichira (suing through her daughter and next friend Naomi Ann Wambui Gichira)

Plaintiff

Samuel Muriuki Gichira

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant fraudulently transferred the suit land from the plaintiff to himself.
  2. 2 Whether the subdivision and registration of the new parcels in the defendant's name was lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff, being alive and of unsound mind, could have her land transferred through a succession cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the suit land until 4th July 2012, when the defendant fraudulently transferred the land to himself using a succession cause, despite the plaintiff being alive. The defendant then subdivided the land into four parcels and registered them in his name. The court held that there could be no valid succession orders in respect of the estate of a living person, and the transfer and subsequent subdivisions were therefore fraudulent. The plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged, and the court was satisfied that the plaintiff had met the standard of proof required to establish fraud. The court ordered cancellation of the defendant's...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Cancellation of the registration of the defendant as proprietor of land parcels KIINE/KIBINGOTI/NGUGUINE/3522, 3523, 3524 and 3525.
  • Consolidation of the four parcels into the former land parcel KIINE/KIBINGOTI/NGUGUINE/955.