[2016] KEELC 1273 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 1273 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent entered into by the parties as its judgment, recognizing that the parties had agreed to the subdivision of the disputed land parcel LR. No. ABOTHUGUCHI/GAITU/109 among the listed beneficiaries in specified shares. The court further ordered the lifting of the inhibition previously placed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 1273 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mary Mwari Andrew; Plaintiff: Margaret Kanuu Mwaja; Plaintiff: Harriet Mugure Samuel; Defendant: Angelina Keeja Kinyua
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 216 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment After Consent
Outcome
suit settled by consent; orders issued as per consent
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Subdivision, Consent Judgment, Transfer of Land, Orders of Inhibition
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Subdivision Consent Judgment Transfer of Land Orders of Inhibition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Mwari Andrew

Plaintiff

Margaret Kanuu Mwaja

Plaintiff

Harriet Mugure Samuel

Plaintiff

Angelina Keeja Kinyua

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment After Consent

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should be compelled to subdivide and transfer land parcel LR. No. ABOTHUGUCHI/GAITU/109 into specified shares to the listed beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the orders of inhibition on the land should be lifted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent entered into by the parties as its judgment, recognizing that the parties had agreed to the subdivision of the disputed land parcel LR. No. ABOTHUGUCHI/GAITU/109 among the listed beneficiaries in specified shares. The court further ordered the lifting of the inhibition previously placed on the land, as the dispute had been conclusively settled. The suit was marked as settled, and the parties were barred from re-litigating matters conclusively determined by this judgment. The consent, being duly signed by the parties and their advocates, was binding and enforceable as a judgment of the court.

Court Disposition

suit settled by consent; orders issued as per consent

Orders

  • The suit is withdrawn with no order as to costs.
  • Land parcel LR. No. ABOTHUGUCHI/GAITU/109 to be subdivided among the named parties in the shares specified in the consent.