[2021] KEHC 3760 (KLR)
The court found that the only estate asset is located in Vihiga County, making it inappropriate for the succession cause to be handled in Nairobi, which is distant from the asset and the beneficiaries. The court emphasized that succession matters should be heard in the court nearest to the location of the estate for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 3760 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Nguyo; Applicant: Adelaida Hoka Mulalai; Applicant: Nifreda Munyela; Respondent: Wilson Mark Wesa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 5 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion to Transfer Succession Cause
- Outcome
- application granted
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Succession Cause, Jurisdiction of High Court, Venue of Succession Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Nguyo
Applicant
Adelaida Hoka Mulalai
Applicant
Nifreda Munyela
Applicant
Wilson Mark Wesa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion to Transfer Succession Cause
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the succession cause should be transferred from the High Court at Nairobi to the High Court at Vihiga, given the location of the estate asset.
- 2 Whether the application offends section 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules or is otherwise procedurally improper.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the only estate asset is located in Vihiga County, making it inappropriate for the succession cause to be handled in Nairobi, which is distant from the asset and the beneficiaries. The court emphasized that succession matters should be heard in the court nearest to the location of the estate for convenience, access to justice, and ease of access to land records. The respondent's procedural objections were dismissed, as the court retains jurisdiction over succession matters even after confirmation of grant and distribution. The application for transfer was granted, and the file was ordered to be moved to the High Court at Vihiga, which is the appropriate forum.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The court file in Nairobi HCSC No. 1477 of 1997, in the matter of the estate of the late Mariko Munala Ndibo, is to be transferred from the Nairobi High Court registry to the High Court registry at Vihiga.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
MISCELLANEOUS SUCCESSION NO. 5 OF 2018
MARY NGUYO……………………..………………..………………….…….1ST APPLICANT
ADELAIDA HOKA MULALAI……….……….………..…………………..2ND APPLICANT
NIFREDA MUNYELA………….…….……………..……..….……………..3RD APPLICANT
VERSUS
WILSON MARK WESA………………………….…………………..……….RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The matter before me is a Motion, dated 18th March 2019, seeking transfer of a succession cause pending at the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, being Nairobi HCSC No. 1477 of 1997 to the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega. It is argued that the estate comprises only of a property known as West Bunyore/Emusire/1029, and that the cause was initiated at Nairobi with a motive to disinherit some of the survivors and beneficiaries.
2. The response to the application is by way of the preliminary objection, dated 7th November 2019. It is argued that the succession cause had been finalized, the application offended section 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the application for transfer ought to have been filed in the cause at Nairobi, and that the registered proprietor of the of the suit parcel of land was the absolute proprietor of the subject land.
3. The Motion seeks a fairly straightforward order, transfer of the succession cause from Nairobi to Kakamega. The argument advanced is fairly simple, the estate comprised of assets situated at Bunyore, within the local limits of the High Court at Kakamega, and there were no assets situate at Nairobi to warrant the matter being in Nairobi. Access to justice would demand that a succession cause ought to be filed at the court nearest to where the estate is situated, so that the parties are able to access the court, and so that, in the event records are required from the lands registry, by either the court or the parties, there would be easier access. It would also be convenient for lands registry staff or officers to attend court where required.
4. The record before me indicates that the deceased died possessed of only one asset, West Bunyore/Emusire/1029. The cause ought not have been filed in Nairobi, some 400 kilometres away from where the asset is situated, and probably away from family members who reside at Bunyore. The grant was confirmed, and the property distributed. However, the office of administrator is for life, and at any time, after distribution, and completion of administration, an administrator can still be called upon to account, and the grant can still be revoked. It is never too late with succession causes.
5. I see nothing wrong with the application. No plausible reason has been given why the matter cannot be transferred from Nairobi. I shall grant it. It would appear that West Bunyore/Emusire/1029 is situated within Vihiga County. A High Court has been established at Vihiga. The matter should be transferred to that court, closest to the registry where the records relating to the assets is situated, and within the County from which the deceased hailed.
6. I consequently order and direct that the court file in Nairobi HCSC No. 1477 of 1977, in the matter of the estate of the late Mariko Munala Ndibo, be transferred from the Nairobi High Court registry to the High Court registry at Vihiga. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE