[2018] KEELC 2716 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2716 (KLR)

With the withdrawal of the appeal, there was no longer any legal impediment to the execution of the lower court judgment delivered on 17.2.2011. The court found that the applicant had no other forum for pursuing execution, as the lower court file was now part of the present proceedings. To ensure the judgment was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2716 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mary Ntiba (Suing as legal representative of the estate of Maliamu Ncurubi M’Ibiri); Defendant: Francis M’Manyara M’Ringera alias Imanyara Ringera
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 80 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Application / Ruling on Execution Application Post Appeal Withdrawal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Transfer of Land, Subdivision of Land, Court Authorized Transfer
Source Language
en
Land and Property Execution of Judgment Transfer of Land Subdivision of Land Court Authorized Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Ntiba (Suing as legal representative of the estate of Maliamu Ncurubi M’Ibiri)

Plaintiff

Francis M’Manyara M’Ringera alias Imanyara Ringera

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Application / Ruling on Execution Application Post Appeal Withdrawal

  1. 1 Whether the court should authorize execution of the lower court judgment following withdrawal of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be empowered to execute transfer documents for the suit property in the absence of the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

With the withdrawal of the appeal, there was no longer any legal impediment to the execution of the lower court judgment delivered on 17.2.2011. The court found that the applicant had no other forum for pursuing execution, as the lower court file was now part of the present proceedings. To ensure the judgment was not rendered nugatory and to prevent further delay or frustration, the court exercised its powers to authorize the Deputy Registrar to execute the necessary transfer documents for the subdivided land parcels in favour of the applicant. The court further directed the Land Registrar to dispense with the production of original documents from the respondent, thereby removing any...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar is authorized to execute transfer documents for L.R No. Nyaki/Kithoka/715 (subdivided into L.R Nos Nyaki/Kithoka/2455/2456/2457/2458 and 2459) in favour of the applicant.
  • The Land Registrar, Meru, is ordered to dispense with production of the original title deed, passport size photos, and photocopies of I.D cards and PIN certificate of the respondent and effect the transfer of the subdivided parcels to the applicant.