[2019] KEELC 2256 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2256 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities. She demonstrated lawful acquisition and continuous possession of the suit property, with supporting documentation and evidence of occupation. The defendants failed to contest the claim or provide any defence. The court accepted the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2256 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mary Teresa Wachira; Defendant: Embakasi Ranching Company Ltd; Defendant: Festus Njoga Kimani
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1273 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Injunctions, Registration of Title, Fraud in Land Transactions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Specific Performance Injunctions Registration of Title Fraud in Land Transactions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Teresa Wachira

Plaintiff

Embakasi Ranching Company Ltd

Defendant

Festus Njoga Kimani

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with her proprietary rights over the suit property.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to specific performance compelling the 1st defendant to process and issue title documents for the suit property and bonus plot.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff should be registered as the owner and proprietor of the suit property and bonus plot.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities. She demonstrated lawful acquisition and continuous possession of the suit property, with supporting documentation and evidence of occupation. The defendants failed to contest the claim or provide any defence. The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of fraud and bad faith by the defendants, including collusion to deprive her of the property and failure to process her title. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction to protect her proprietary rights, specific performance compelling the 1st defendant to issue title documents for the suit property and bonus plot, and...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's proprietary rights over Plot No. P.5938 and/or Plot No. 1309 in Ruai Estate, Embakasi.
  • Specific performance compelling the 1st defendant to process and issue the plaintiff with title documents for Plot No. P.5938 and/or Plot No. 1309.