[2008] KEHC 936 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on liability against both defendants, as the stationary trailer owned by the 1st defendant and driven by the 2nd defendant was parked on the road without warning signs or reflectors, constituting negligence. The plaintiff, a lawful passenger, suffered severe...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 936 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mary Wambui Gichuki; Defendant: Coast Haulier Ltd; Defendant: Adow Issa Abdi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 2399 of 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally.
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accidents, Personal Injury, Negligence, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Wambui Gichuki
Plaintiff
Coast Haulier Ltd
Defendant
Adow Issa Abdi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were liable for the road traffic accident involving the plaintiff.
- 2 What quantum of damages, both special and general, should be awarded to the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on liability against both defendants, as the stationary trailer owned by the 1st defendant and driven by the 2nd defendant was parked on the road without warning signs or reflectors, constituting negligence. The plaintiff, a lawful passenger, suffered severe injuries as a direct result of this negligence. The court accepted the medical evidence and the plaintiff's testimony as unchallenged, since the defendants did not offer any evidence. On damages, the court considered comparable awards in similar cases and determined that KES 500,000 was fair general damages for the injuries sustained, with KES 4,500 awarded as special damages for...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally.
Orders
- The defendants shall pay the plaintiff KES 504,500 as general and special damages.
- The plaintiff shall have costs of the suit plus interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Civil Case 2399 of 1992
MARY WAMBUI GICHUKI……………………........……………..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
COAST HAULIER LTD & ANOTHER……….....………1ST DEFENDANT
ADOW ISSA ABDI……………….……………………….2ND DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
This claim arises out of a road traffic accident which occurred on 10th December 1989 along Thika – Sagana Road involving motor vehicle registration No. KVZ 787 and motor vehicle registration No KTB 428 Z. 9487. The plaintiff was traveling as a lawful passenger in motor vehicle registration No KVZ 787. As a result of the said accident the plaintiff sustained the following injuries:-
(1) Fractured bilateral femur
(2) Dislocation of the left ankle
(3) Head injury
(4) Blunt injury to the chest wall
(5) Bruises of the iliac crest
(6) Bruises of the left side of the neck
(7) Pains, blood loss and soft tissue injuries
These injuries were confirmed by Dr. Kiama Wangai (PW1) who examined and treated her and who prepared the medical report dated 14th July 2006 which he produced in court. She brought this suit against the defendants who were the registered owner of the accident motor vehicle and his driver respectively seeking both special and general damages.
The plaintiff in her evidence told the court that she used to work with the bank but now she is retired and she is a housewife. On the 10th December 1989 she was traveling in the family motor car registration No. KVZ 787 which was being driven by her husband along Nyeri-Sagana Road. When they reached Riandira Area there was a stationery trailer registration No KTB 428 Z. 9487 which was parked on the road. That motor vehicle did not have warning signs nor did it have reflectors for warning the oncoming motorists. The driver of the saloon car hit the trailer from the rear and as a result of the said accident she sustained injuries as stated above and which were confirmed by the medical report as stated above. She became unconscious and was rushed to Muranga District Hospital where she was given first aid and she was transferred to Nairobi Hospital where she was admitted for 3 months. She was discharged and later readmitted at KNH in July 1990 for one week where she underwent an operation of on the ankle. Again she was later readmitted for the removal of the blade which had been fixed on her leg. She later continued with treatment as an out patient but now she has recovered. She blamed the accident wholly on the 1st defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the defendants elected not to offer any evidence.
Having considered the plaintiff’s case in light of the evidence adduced and the exhibits availed in court I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved her case on liability against both defendants. The next issue before me is the assessment of damages both special and general. On special damages the only amount proved is a figure of Sh 4500/= in respect of the consultation fee paid to Dr Kiame Wangai otherwise all hospital bill were paid by the plaintiffs previous employer. On general damages Counsel for the plaintiff suggested a figure of Sh 2,000,000/= and referred the court two authorities which I have considered. The first authority cited was the case of John Mwangi v. Harison Waweru & another NAKURU HCCC No. 501 of1997 where the court awarded Sh 700,000/= general damages. The other authority cited was that of Stephen Gikonyo v Peter Kirimi NAKURU HCCC No 109 of 2002 where the court awarded Shs. 800,000/= general damages.
Having considered the injuries sustained by the plaintiff in the cited authorities and damages awarded and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff in the instant case and taking into account that damages are not meant to unfairly enrich the plaintiff but a fair compensation it is my considered opinion that a figure of Sh 500,00/= would be adequate compensation for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff.
Accordingly there shall be judgment for the plaintiff and against the defendants jointly and severally for Sh 504,500/=. The plaintiff shall be costs of this suit plus interest.
Delivered and dated at Nairobi this 16th day of May 2008.
J. L. A. OSIEMO
JUDGE