[2015] KEELC 573 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 573 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant's desire to relocate for the welfare of her children is understandable, the application was premature, particularly in respect to JM, who was about to attain the age of majority and thus become capable of making his own decisions regarding the trust property. The court also...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 573 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Wanjira
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 47 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
BN Olao
Legal Topics
Trusts Over Land, Guardianship of Minors, Land Exchange, Tenancy for Life, Registration of Land, Child Welfare
Source Language
en
Land and Property Family and Children Trusts Over Land Guardianship of Minors Land Exchange Tenancy for Life Registration of Land Child Welfare

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Wanjira

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be appointed as guardian of her minor children JM and DW.
  2. 2 Whether the trust and tenancy for life over L.R No. INOI/KARIKO/3322 should be terminated to facilitate a land exchange.
  3. 3 Whether the court should direct the Land Registrar to register the exchanged land in the names of the minors.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant's desire to relocate for the welfare of her children is understandable, the application was premature, particularly in respect to JM, who was about to attain the age of majority and thus become capable of making his own decisions regarding the trust property. The court also noted the absence of any proposal or assurance as to how the Ksh. 500,000/= compensation would be managed for the benefit of the minors. Given these factors, the court determined that it would not be in the best interests of the minors, especially JM, to grant the orders sought at this time. The application was therefore dismissed, with the court suggesting that the applicant...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 24th November 2014 is dismissed.