[2020] KEELC 2907 (KLR)
The court found that although the plaintiff's list of documents was filed outside the time stipulated by the court for compliance with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules and without leave of court, the overriding interest of justice required that all relevant evidence be considered. The court exercised its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 2907 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Maryann Mohamed Cheabril (Suing as the administrator of the estate of Asha Jabril Mohamed, deceased); Defendant: Michael Koome Mburugu; Defendant: Isiolo County Government; Defendant: Jediel Kirimi Rutere; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: The National Land Commission; Defendant: The Director of Survey; Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 06 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application—admissibility of Late Filed Documents
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's late-filed list of documents deemed properly filed; defendants granted leave to respond.
- Legal Topics
- Late Filing of Documents, Order 11 Civil Procedure Rules, Admissibility of Evidence, Leave of Court, Land Title Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maryann Mohamed Cheabril (Suing as the administrator of the estate of Asha Jabril Mohamed, deceased)
Plaintiff
Michael Koome Mburugu
Defendant
Isiolo County Government
Defendant
Jediel Kirimi Rutere
Defendant
Chief Land Registrar
Defendant
The National Land Commission
Defendant
The Director of Survey
Defendant
The Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application—admissibility of Late Filed Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's list of documents filed on 11th March, 2020, should be expunged for being filed out of time without leave of court.
- 2 Whether the interests of justice warrant the admission of the late-filed documents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the plaintiff's list of documents was filed outside the time stipulated by the court for compliance with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules and without leave of court, the overriding interest of justice required that all relevant evidence be considered. The court exercised its discretion to deem the documents properly filed, noting that the defendants would not suffer prejudice as they were granted liberal leave to respond to any new evidence within 30 days. The court balanced the need for procedural compliance with the imperative to do substantive justice between the parties.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's late-filed list of documents deemed properly filed; defendants granted leave to respond.
Orders
- The plaintiff’s list of documents filed on 11th March, 2020, is deemed properly filed in the greater interest of justice.
- The defendants have liberal leave to respond to any new evidence contained in the list of documents within 30 days of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 06 OF 2019
MARYANN MOHAMED CHEABRIL
(Suing as the administrator of the estate of
Asha Jabril Mohamed (deceased)...............................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MICHAEL KOOME MBURUGU...................................1ST DEFENDANT
ISIOLO COUNTY GOVERNMENT ............................2ND DEFENDANT
JEDIEL KIRIMI RUTERE..............................................3RD DEFENDANT
CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR............................................4TH DEFENDANT
THE NATIONAL LAND COMMISSION.......................5TH DEFENDANT
THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEY.......................................6TH DEFENDANT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.........................................7TH DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The Ruling in this matter was to be delivered on 24th March, 2020. This could not be done because of complications brought about by the Corona Virus Crisis. Upon issuance of the apposite notice to the parties, the Ruling will be delivered in open court today. This is because this court lacks the necessary technological facilities to deliver the Ruling electronically. However, all precautions have been taken to ensure compliance with all measures necessary to obviate the spread of the Corona 2019 virus.
2. On 11th March, 2020, the Plaintiff filed the following list of documents:
1. Special Power of Attorney dated 27th February ,2018.
2. Deed Plan Number 129803.
3. Certified grant of letters of administration intestate issued on 19th January, 2017.
4. Certificate copy of the Title for LR. No. 7918/107.
5. Letter dated 29th May, 2017 from Chief Officer Land, Physical Planning and Environment.
6. Letter dated 18th July, 2012 from City County of Isiolo, Eastern Province to Mr. Nteere.
7. Letter dated 29th April, 2019 from Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to Mr. Jacob K. Mutua, Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions.
8. Letter dated 15th April, 2019 from Ahmed Khadar Mohamed to DPP and DCI.
9. Letter dated 15th April, 2019 from Ahmed Khadar Mohamed to Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission.
3. The list of documents was served upon the advocates representing the defendants in court on 11th March, 2020 Mr. Mwirigi Kaburu the 1st defendant’s advocate asked the court to have the documents expunged because they had been filed out of the time stipulated by the court for compliance with order 11 of the Civil Procedures and without the leave of court. He was supported by Mr. Murango Mwenda for the 3rd defendant, M/s Mwiraria for the 2nd defendant and Mr. Kiongo for the 4th, 6th and 7th defendants.
4. Mr. Lakicha for the plaintiff agreed that the list of documents was indeed filed outside the time stipulated by the court for compliance with order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules. He laid blame on his assistant who had earlier on handled this matter. He said that it was in the interest of justice that parties do proffer all relevant evidence. He said that this would not prejudice the defendants as they would have enough time to rebut any new evidence introduced by the plaintiff. He asked the court not to expunge the list of documents from the court’s record.
5. Upon consideration of all facts and circumstances of this case, I issue the following orders:
a. The plaintiff’s list of documents filed on 11th March, 2020, is, in the greater interest of justice, deemed properly filed.
b. The defendants have liberal leave to respond to any new evidence contained in the list of documents within 30 days of this ruling.
c. Parties will come to court for directions on 14th October, 2020.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 5th day of May, 2020 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Ndege for the plaintiff
Mark Muriithi h/b Mwirigi Kaburu for 1st defendant
P. M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.