[2019] KEELC 2965 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2965 (KLR)

The court declined to dismiss the suit for non-attendance, exercising its discretion under Order 12(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, on the basis that there was no certainty all parties were aware of the hearing date. The court instead granted another opportunity for the parties to be heard, scheduled the hearing of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2965 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Maryann Mohamed Cheabril (Suing as the administrator of the estate of Asha Jabril Mohamed, deceased); Defendant: Michael Koome Mburugu; Defendant: Isiolo County Government; Defendant: Jediel Kirimi Rutere; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: The National Land Commission; Defendant: The Director of Survey; Defendant: The Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 06 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Interlocutory Ruling on Hearing Date and Directions
Outcome
Suit not dismissed; hearing date and directions issued.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Suit Dismissal, Order 12 Civil Procedure Rules, Hearing Notice, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Suit Dismissal Order 12 Civil Procedure Rules Hearing Notice Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maryann Mohamed Cheabril (Suing as the administrator of the estate of Asha Jabril Mohamed, deceased)

Plaintiff

Michael Koome Mburugu

Defendant

Isiolo County Government

Defendant

Jediel Kirimi Rutere

Defendant

Chief Land Registrar

Defendant

The National Land Commission

Defendant

The Director of Survey

Defendant

The Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Interlocutory Ruling on Hearing Date and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-attendance under Order 12(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether all parties had notice of the hearing date.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to dismiss the suit for non-attendance, exercising its discretion under Order 12(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, on the basis that there was no certainty all parties were aware of the hearing date. The court instead granted another opportunity for the parties to be heard, scheduled the hearing of the plaintiff's application interpartes, and directed that notice be issued to all parties. This approach ensures fairness and upholds the right to be heard, particularly where there is doubt as to whether due notice was served.

Court Disposition

Suit not dismissed; hearing date and directions issued.

Orders

  • The application dated 27th June, 2018, filed by the plaintiff, will be heard interpartes on 15th July, 2019.
  • Directions to be given on 15th July, 2019 and hearing of apposite issues to take place on the same day.