https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6248

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6248

The petition centered on the right to occupy premises and the ownership of the house allegedly leased by the petitioner, which brought the dispute within the realm of use, occupation, and title to land. That subject matter falls under the Environment and Land Court, not the High Court. The High Court therefore...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 6248 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Faith Mwende Masai; 1st Respondent: The National Housing Corporation; 2nd Respondent: The Inspector General; 3rd Respondent: The Attorney General; Interested Party: Lucas Oluoch
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition E290 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition and Application for Conservatory Orders / Ruling on Jurisdiction After Certificate of Urgency and Directions
Outcome
Petition transferred to the Environment and Land Court; High Court declared itself without jurisdiction.
Judges
["RE Aburili"]
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Transfer of Proceedings, Occupation and Title to Land, Eviction Dispute, Conservatory Orders
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Environment and Land Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Transfer of Proceedings Occupation and Title to Land Eviction Dispute Conservatory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faith Mwende Masai

Petitioner

The National Housing Corporation

1st Respondent

The Inspector General

2nd Respondent

The Attorney General

3rd Respondent

Lucas Oluoch

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition and Application for Conservatory Orders / Ruling on Jurisdiction After Certificate of Urgency and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the petition
  2. 2 Whether the dispute concerned occupation and title to land within the exclusive mandate of the Environment and Land Court
  3. 3 What orders should follow if the court lacked jurisdiction

Ratio Decidendi

The petition centered on the right to occupy premises and the ownership of the house allegedly leased by the petitioner, which brought the dispute within the realm of use, occupation, and title to land. That subject matter falls under the Environment and Land Court, not the High Court. The High Court therefore lacked jurisdiction and could not proceed with the petition.

Court Disposition

Petition transferred to the Environment and Land Court; High Court declared itself without jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The court downed its tools for want of jurisdiction.
  • The petition was transferred to the Environment and Land Court for further directions.