[2015] KEELRC 1025 (KLR)
The Employment and Labour Relations Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to reinstate or transfer Milimani CMCC No. 1022 of 2004 because the suit had already been dismissed by the Magistrate's Court. Once a suit is dismissed, it ceases to exist, and the only remedies available to the aggrieved party are to seek...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 1025 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Masimiano Njeru Mbiti; Respondent: Mrs Joyce Boswell & Another
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 111 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Magistrates Court, Transfer of Suit, Reinstatement of Dismissed Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Masimiano Njeru Mbiti
Applicant
Mrs Joyce Boswell & Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court can reinstate and transfer a suit that has already been dismissed by the Magistrate's Court.
- 2 Whether the application to transfer Milimani CMCC No. 1022 of 2004 is fatally defective given the prior dismissal of the suit.
- 3 What remedies are available to a claimant after dismissal of a suit by the Magistrate's Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment and Labour Relations Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to reinstate or transfer Milimani CMCC No. 1022 of 2004 because the suit had already been dismissed by the Magistrate's Court. Once a suit is dismissed, it ceases to exist, and the only remedies available to the aggrieved party are to seek review before the same Magistrate or to file an appeal against the dismissal. The application before the court was therefore fatally defective, as there was no subsisting suit to transfer or reinstate. The court dismissed the application with costs, emphasizing that procedural law does not permit the revival or transfer of a non-existent suit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application to reinstate and transfer Milimani CMCC No. 1022 of 2004 is dismissed.
- The applicant shall bear the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA
CAUSE NO. MISC 111 OF 2014
MASIMIANO NJERU MBITI………………………….CLAIMANT
VERSUS
MRS JOYCE BOSWELL & ANOTHER…..……….RESPONDENT
Mr. Njuguna for the Claimant
RULING
The preliminary objection was filed by the Respondents in this suit on the grounds that the Misc. Application is fatally defective and same be dismissed.
2. The Application seeks to have this court reinstate Milimani CMCC No. 1022 of 2004 and transfer it to this court for hearing and determination.
3. The application is founded on the following grounds set out on the face of the Notice of Motion;
a) CMCC No 1022 of 2004 was filed in the Chief Magistrate court at Milimani prior to the passage of the Industrial Court Act 2011, the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and establishment of this court.
b) The case falls outside the ambit of the Chief Magistrate court’s jurisdiction.
c) That no prejudice will be occasioned by the Respondents
4. The application is further buttressed by a supporting affidavit of M/s Sylvia Malembe Kitonga, Advocate for the Claimant.
5. According to the Advocate, the suit was dismissed on 3rd September, 2008 by the Chief Magistrate for none attendance. An Application for reinstatement was filed and same was granted on 22nd January, 2009. Another application dated 25th July, 2012 was filed seeking to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
6. The Claimant filed a replying affidavit on 17th August 2012 opposing the application for dismissal for want of prosecution and challenging the jurisdiction of the Magistrate’s Court to entertain the matter.
7. The Magistrate directed the matter be fixed for hearing within 60 days. An exparte date was granted on 28th February, 2013 and the Matter was not listed on that day.
8. On 7th May 2013, the Magistrate Court directed that the claimant apply for extension of time. The application was set for hearing on 31st July, 2013.
9. A notice of preliminary objection was filed on 31st July 2013 by the Respondent and served on the Claimants on 6th August, 2013.
10. On 7th August, 2013 the set mention date, the claimant sought time to file a replying affidavit which was filed on 23rd August, 2013 together with grounds of opposition. The matter was to be mentioned on 5th September, 2013.
11. On 26th September, 2013 parties were directed to file written submission which was done on 16th October, 2013.
12. A ruling was delivered on 28th March, 2014 in which the Senior Principal Magistrate upheld the prelimary objection by the Respondents with the effect that the suit stood dismissed effective 28th March, 2013.
13. This being the undisputed course of events, the Application to this court dated 9th December, 2014, seeking for orders to have Milimani CMCC No 1022 of 2004 transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) is fatally defective for the simple reason that this cause ceased to exist the day it was dismissed.
14. A ruling dismissing the suit was delivered on 28th March, 2014 by the Senior Principal Magistrate.
15. The only action available to the claimant/applicant was to either seek the same Magistrate to review his ruling and consequential orders or file an appeal against the ruling of the Magistrate Court.
16. This application is therefore dismissed with costs for the aforesaid reasons.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 22nd day of May, 2015.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE