[2022] KEELC 14488 (KLR)
The court held that the relief of stay of execution pending appeal is discretionary under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant had demonstrated an intention to appeal by filing a notice of appeal, which was sufficient for the purposes of the application. The court found that it was not its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 14488 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Masore Nyang’au & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Supplies & Services Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 286 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- conditional stay of execution granted
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Masore Nyang’au & Co. Advocates
Applicant
Supplies & Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant must seek leave to appeal before obtaining a stay of execution.
- 3 What conditions should be imposed for the grant of stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the relief of stay of execution pending appeal is discretionary under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant had demonstrated an intention to appeal by filing a notice of appeal, which was sufficient for the purposes of the application. The court found that it was not its role at this stage to assess the validity or strength of the intended appeal. To balance the interests of both parties and ensure justice, the court granted a conditional stay of execution for 90 days, requiring the applicant to deposit the decretal sum in court within 21 days, failing which the stay would lapse.
Court Disposition
conditional stay of execution granted
Orders
- An order of stay of execution of the judgment is given for a period of 90 days.
- The applicant is directed to deposit the sum of KES 580,191 in court within 21 days, failing which the stay shall lapse.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Masore Nyang’au & Co. Adcocates v Supplies & Services Limited (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 286 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 14488 (KLR) (27 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 14488 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 286 of 2021
LN Mbugua, J
October 27, 2022
Between
Masore Nyang’au & Co. Adcocates
Applicant
and
Supplies & Services Limited
Defendant
Ruling
1. Before me is an application dated October 3, 2022 where the applicant client seeks orders of stay of execution of the judgment and decree herein pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. The applicant avers that it was dissatisfied with the judgment, hence the intention to appeal and to this end, they have duly filed a notice of appeal. The applicant avers that their appeal has high chances of success, and if successful, the same may be rendered nugatory if the orders are not granted. The applicant is ready and willing to abide by any conditions set out by the court.
2. The application is opposedvidethe grounds of opposition and a replying affidavit both dated October 11, 2022 where it is argued that there is no automatic right to appeal, since leave to appeal ought to have been sought. The advocate contends that he is capable of restitution in the event the appeal is successful.
3. I have considered all the arguments raised herein. The relief of stay of execution pending Appeal is governed by order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and the same is discretionary. See Loice Khachendi Onyango v Alex Inyangu & another [2017] eKLR.
4. In the case ofEquity Bank Limited v West Link MBO Limited Civil Application no 78 of 2011 cited in Dickson Muricho Muriuki v Timothy Kagondu Muruiki & 6 others[2013] eKLR, it was held that;“Courts of law exist to administer justice and in so doing they must of necessity balance between competing rights and interests of different parties but within the confines of law, to ensure the ends of justice are met”.
5. The issue of the validity and strength of the appeal is not the province of this court. It is enough that the applicant/client has made his intention to appeal vide the alleged notice of appeal.
6. I proceed to give a conditional stay of execution of the Judgment in the following terms:1. An order of stay of execution of the judgment herein is given for a period of 90 days.2. The applicant is directed to deposit the sum of ksh. 580,191 in court within a period of 21 days otherwise the orders of stay shall lapse.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:-Masore for the AdvocateIngutya for ClientCourt assistant: Eddel