[2014] KEHC 7846 (KLR)
The court found that, based on the material before it, the applicants' advocates acted promptly after learning of the judgment by seeking instructions and filing the application for leave to appeal out of time. The court was satisfied that the applicants had demonstrated good and sufficient cause for not filing the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7846 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Master Zephania Magama; Applicant: Chris Wears Limited; Respondent: Agnes Makena Karia; Respondent: Simon Githinji Murugu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 1092 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Master Zephania Magama
Applicant
Chris Wears Limited
Applicant
Agnes Makena Karia
Respondent
Simon Githinji Murugu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have demonstrated good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time.
- 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, based on the material before it, the applicants' advocates acted promptly after learning of the judgment by seeking instructions and filing the application for leave to appeal out of time. The court was satisfied that the applicants had demonstrated good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed period, as required by section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The absence of lower court proceedings meant the court could not verify the contested issue of notice, but the applicants' explanation was accepted as credible. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave to appeal out of time is granted.
- The applicants shall file their memorandum of appeal within fourteen (14) days of the ruling date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL DIVISION
MISC APPLICATION NO 1092 OF 2013
MASTER ZEPHANIA MAGAMA
CHRIS WEARS LIMITED ...........................APPLICANTS
VERSUS
AGNES MAKENA KARIA
2. SIMON GITHINJI MURUGU........................RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
1. This application (notice of motion dated 14/11/2013) seeks leave to lodge appeal out of time against the decree of the lower court passed on 05/09/2013 in a case that has not been identified fully in the papers filed herein. The Applicants have stated that the judgment of the lower court was delivered without notice, and that the present application was filed as soon as possible after their advocates became aware of the judgment and obtained instructions to appeal. That is explained in the supporting affidavit sworn by one Peter Ogwandi, the Commercial Manager of the Applicants’ insurers.
2. The Respondent has opposed the application by a replying affidavit filed on 11/03/2014. The main ground of opposition urged is that judgment was delivered on the date reserved by court at conclusion of the hearing, and that the said date had been given in the presence of advocates for both sides.
3. As at present the court does not have before it proceedings of the lower court in order to verify the contested issue regarding whether the lower court delivered its judgment with notice to both sides.
4. Under the proviso to section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 the court may admit an appeal out of time “if the appellant satisfies the court that he had good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time”.
5. It may well turn out that the judgment of the lower court was delivered without notice to the Applicants. I am persuaded, upon the material now before the court, that after learning of the judgment the Applicants’ advocates sought instructions, and subsequently filed the present application as soon as they could after obtaining such instructions. I am thus satisfied that the Applicants had good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.
6. In the event I will allow the application and grant the leave sought. The Applicants shall file their memorandum of appeal within fourteen (14) days of today. Costs shall be in such appeal. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 8th DAY OF MAY 2014
H.P.G. WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY 2014