[2024] KECA 962 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay—late supply of proceedings and judgment—was reasonable and that the delay of approximately 17 days was not inordinate. In the absence of opposition from the respondent and in the interest of justice, the court exercised its discretion to allow the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KECA 962 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Simon Njuguna Mathenge; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E019 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- WK Korir
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Robbery With Violence, Identification Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Njuguna Mathenge
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate.
- 3 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the High Court judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay—late supply of proceedings and judgment—was reasonable and that the delay of approximately 17 days was not inordinate. In the absence of opposition from the respondent and in the interest of justice, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time. The attached notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal were deemed duly filed, enabling the applicant to pursue his intended appeal against the High Court's dismissal of his conviction and sentence for robbery with violence.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application for extension of time for filing a notice of appeal is allowed.
- The notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal annexed to the application are deemed as duly filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mathenge v Republic (Criminal Application E019 of 2024) [2024] KECA 962 (KLR) (26 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KECA 962 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Criminal Application E019 of 2024
WK Korir, JA
July 26, 2024
Between
Simon Njuguna Mathenge
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(An application for leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyandarua (C. Kariuki, J.) delivered on 7th March 2024inH.C.CR.A. No. 04 of 2021)
Ruling
1. Although the applicant, Simon Njuguna Mathenge, in his application dated 8th April 2024 indicates that he seeks extension of time to appeal against the decision in Nyahururu Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 1326 of 2016, it is apparent that what he actually seeks is leave to appeal out of time against the judgment delivered by C. Kariuki J. on 7th March 2024 in Nyandarua High Court Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021.
2. It is the applicant’s case that his appeal from the decision of the magistrate’s court against conviction and sentence for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code was dismissed by C. Kariuki J. on 7th March 2024 and he now wishes to appeal to this Court, on among other grounds, that he was not positively identified and that the elements of the offence of robbery with violence were not proved by the prosecution.
3. The reason given for the delay in filing the appeal within the prescribed period is that the proceedings and judgment of the first appellate court were supplied late.
4. There is no response to the application.
5. Considering the reason advanced by the applicant to explain the delay, and appreciating that the delay was not inordinate as it was for only about 17 days, I find that the applicant should be given an opportunity to pursue his intended appeal.
6. In the circumstances, the application for extension of time for filing a notice of appeal is allowed. In view of the fact that the applicant has annexed to the application a notice of appeal and a memorandum of appeal, the stated documents are deemed as duly filed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024W. KORIRJUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.SignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR