[2014] KEELRC 336 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 336 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had complied with the court order by paying the applicant all arrears of half salary for the period of suspension, as evidenced by the credited amounts in the applicant's salary account. The interim orders previously granted were set aside due to their interim nature and the need...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 336 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mathew Mulyungi; Respondent: Mwingi Mwalimu Sacco Cooperative Society Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1528 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Interim Orders, Salary Arrears, Suspension Payments
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Contempt of Court Interim Orders Salary Arrears Suspension Payments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mathew Mulyungi

Applicant

Mwingi Mwalimu Sacco Cooperative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was in contempt of the court order regarding payment of half salary during suspension.
  2. 2 Whether the interim orders granted on 24th September 2013 should be set aside pending interpartes hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had complied with the court order by paying the applicant all arrears of half salary for the period of suspension, as evidenced by the credited amounts in the applicant's salary account. The interim orders previously granted were set aside due to their interim nature and the need for a full interpartes hearing. As a result, there was no basis for holding the respondent in contempt, and the application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application to hold the respondent in contempt of court is dismissed.
  • Costs in the cause.