[2015] KECA 17 (KLR)

[2015] KECA 17 (KLR)

The Court allowed the informal application for withdrawal of the appeal as it was unopposed by the respondent. The withdrawal was granted pursuant to rule 68(4) of the Court of Appeal Rules, and the appeal was accordingly marked as withdrawn. The court exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal since there...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KECA 17 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mathew Musina Amendo; Appellant: John Elisha; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 42 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Withdrawal of Appeal Before Hearing
Outcome
Appeal marked as withdrawn.
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Appeal Withdrawal, Criminal Procedure, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Withdrawal Criminal Procedure Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mathew Musina Amendo

Appellant

John Elisha

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Withdrawal of Appeal Before Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the appellants' application to withdraw the criminal appeal should be granted under the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allowed the informal application for withdrawal of the appeal as it was unopposed by the respondent. The withdrawal was granted pursuant to rule 68(4) of the Court of Appeal Rules, and the appeal was accordingly marked as withdrawn. The court exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal since there was no objection from the prosecution and no legal impediment to granting the application.

Court Disposition

Appeal marked as withdrawn.

Orders

  • The appeal is marked as withdrawn under rule 68(4) of the Court of Appeal Rules.