[2015] KEHC 3912 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3912 (KLR)

The court found that the existence of a customary marriage between the applicant and the deceased could not be determined at the interlocutory stage due to conflicting affidavit evidence and lack of cogent proof. The applicant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case with a probability of success or that he would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was not granted, as any loss suffered would be compensable by damages. Consequently, the court relied on the balance of convenience, determining that it was in the interests of justice to preserve the status quo by halting the burial of the deceased until the main suit could be heard and determined or until further orders. This approach...

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3912 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mathews Mabusi; Defendant: William Situma; Defendant: Edna Situma
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
17 June 2015
Case Number
Civil Suit 58 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Application for temporary injunction granted in terms of prayer (c) of the Notice of Motion. Each party to bear own costs.
Judges
J Karanja
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Burial Rights, Customary Law Marriage, Bukusu Customary Law
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Family and Children Injunctions Burial Rights Customary Law Marriage Bukusu Customary Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mathews Mabusi

Plaintiff

William Situma

Defendant

Edna Situma

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant a temporary injunction restraining the removal and burial of the deceased's body.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the existence of a customary marriage between the applicant and the deceased could not be determined at the interlocutory stage due to conflicting affidavit evidence and lack of cogent proof. The applicant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case with a probability of success or that he would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was not granted, as any loss suffered would be compensable by damages. Consequently, the court relied on the balance of convenience, determining that it was in the interests of justice to preserve the status quo by halting the burial of the deceased until the main suit could be heard and determined or until further orders. This approach...

Court Disposition

Application for temporary injunction granted in terms of prayer (c) of the Notice of Motion. Each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the defendants, their family members, or any person acting through them from removing or burying the body of Christine Nanjala Situma except at the deceased's matrimonial home at No.376 Kapkoi-West Scheme Kwanza Sub-County of Trans-Nzoia County, pending hearing and...
  • Each party to bear their own costs of the application.